From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8374A40927D; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 14:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790173003; cv=none; b=dFhPOLztBRLVzbN3jqklYEvcoPkyEkCuhGhWoRUk50afrkHYn0HJoWe5mdNOed0tDcfmcdHJp3wRSMH0xR3prkaJn8XAQxyLDTp3VD+l38ev5p4fWrWHujBdu6Yo0ildVHY1WpsxvzW69Lx36OCvMUk+uV3vULj7DuS1dtCbedk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790173003; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pjn94+QqUnplTf/Lw8dWChtvZoqbVQzZ8y3uw2QFkK0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=POnV/+WoQD9A2Col0uubv7m4EqWQUopy8ahbem3OpPGygLotD8C1S8yv8gma0CS3l6vjPEorApdKmeHVuDsqj0ZAN3vQDI47HkSlUxaiq+dBNZVehVupRwJnOkixPgRMKOk0U65PfCqEUD+oLV0NoO6cr9P0Y2MJNz0T0ZzAkGs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=Gx8orI2C; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="Gx8orI2C" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7320D152B; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 07:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 551B43F86C; Wed, 23 Sep 2026 07:16:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1790173001; bh=pjn94+QqUnplTf/Lw8dWChtvZoqbVQzZ8y3uw2QFkK0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=Gx8orI2ClszWd17W6QarNcdz4HjWcAVSUfocdkWWupY7BYnCdOl1+ghmFEZznYJ7X rZUKyAfbgqhAIeBAo+EAgkpUgGl63WGXSVl8onWaaUU6DzMO8L3XdhAqijee00jNWV IDeczs3B4hH++oOrlYSfwTCms1AeMaB4V4aEJ8qI= Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 15:16:36 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: enable HAVE_SHARED_GPIOS for all ARM64 platforms Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260907-arm64-have-shared-gpios-v1-1-31af942ab30f@oss.qualcomm.com> On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 04:50:34PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Shared GPIO management provided by the GPIO shared proxy module has been > enabled for Qualcomm platforms for some time. By extension of the > defconfig, it's been effectively enabled for all ARM64 platforms when > using the default configuration. Bugs discovered initially after the > feature was first enabled, were fixed and I haven't seen any new reports > for several months. Make the feature enabled by default for all ARM64 > platforms officially, which will allow us to continue the removal of the > deprecated GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE flag from the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) Since it touches more lines in Kconfig.platforms (2 vs 1), I'd leave this to the arm-soc people to merge (I also got a minor conflict in Kconfig.platforms). Acked-by: Catalin Marinas