mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Park Tae-sun <ts930@dgu.ac.kr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	 "Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	 Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	 Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	 Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
	Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: fix mlock2 errno handling and false PASS on ENOSYS
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:27:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arRD62HaBCs4Svcz@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923-selftests-mm-mlock2-fix-v1-1-750b627854c6@dgu.ac.kr>

On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 06:26:48PM +0900, Park Tae-sun wrote:
> While inspecting selftests/mm syscall wrappers, I noticed that mlock2_()
> in mlock2.h handles the syscall return value differently from other
> wrappers:
> 
>     int ret = syscall(__NR_mlock2, start, len, flags);
>     if (ret) {
>         errno = ret;
>         return -1;
>     }
> 
> Commit 1ddae9d67ee1 ("selftests/mm/mlock: print error on failure")
> introduced this intending to make mlock2_() behave like libc by setting
> errno and returning -1. However, glibc syscall(2) already returns -1 on
> failure and sets positive errno. Assigning "errno = ret;" overwrites
> errno with -1.
> 
> To verify this, mlock2 was disabled in the kernel (via sys_ni_syscall) to
> return -ENOSYS. Testing revealed two interrelated defects:
> 
> 1. In the unmodified test, mlock2_() clobbered errno to -1. The check
>    "if (ret && errno == ENOSYS)" in main() was bypassed, resulting in an
>    immediate crash in the first test:
> 
>        ~ # ./mlock2-tests
>        TAP version 13
>        1..15
>        Bail out! mlock2(0): Unknown error -1
>        # Planned tests != run tests (15 != 0)
>        # Totals: pass:0 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>        (exit code: 1 - FAIL)
> 
> 2. After restoring mlock2_() to directly return syscall(), errno correctly
>    retained ENOSYS (38), entering the ENOSYS check in main(). However, it
>    then called ksft_finished():
> 
>        ~ # ./mlock2-tests
>        TAP version 13
>        # Totals: pass:0 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>        ~ # echo $?
>        0
> 
>    Because ksft_set_plan() had not been called yet (ksft_plan == 0) and
>    zero tests ran (ksft_pass == 0), ksft_finished() evaluated 0 == 0 as
>    success and exited with KSFT_PASS (code 0) without any TAP skip header.
> 
> Fix both issues by:
> 1. Returning the syscall() result directly in mlock2_() so that errno is
>    preserved.
> 2. Calling ksft_exit_skip() on ENOSYS so unsupported kernels report a TAP
>    skip ("1..0 # SKIP ...") and exit with KSFT_SKIP (code 4).
> 
> Verification on the mlock2-disabled kernel:
> 
>     ~ # ./mlock2-tests
>     TAP version 13
>     1..0 # SKIP mlock2() syscall is not supported
>     ~ # echo $?
>     4
> 
> Re-enabling mlock2 in the kernel confirmed all 15 tests pass cleanly:
> 
>     ~ # ./mlock2-tests
>     TAP version 13
>     1..15
>     ok 1 test_mlock_lock: Locked
>     ...
>     ok 15 test_mlockall_future_droppable: droppable memory not locked
>     # Totals: pass:15 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
>     ~ # echo $?
>     0
> 
> Fixes: 1ddae9d67ee1 ("selftests/mm/mlock: print error on failure")
> Fixes: 65c89684896d ("selftests/mm: mlock2-tests: conform test to TAP format output")
> Signed-off-by: Park Tae-sun <ts930@dgu.ac.kr>


Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23  9:26 Park Tae-sun
2026-09-23 21:27 ` Gregory Price [this message]
2026-09-24  8:40 ` Usama Anjum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arRD62HaBCs4Svcz@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
    --to=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=ts930@dgu.ac.kr \
    --cc=usama.anjum@arm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®