From: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
To: Jinseob Kim <kimjinseob88@gmail.com>
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, andy@kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: buffer: serialize buffer teardown with mode claims
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 09:24:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arTeK0QadzWkI6jH@nsa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921062421.64647-1-kimjinseob88@gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 03:24:21PM +0900, Jinseob Kim wrote:
> Buffer-mode claims hold mlock to guarantee that the device remains in
> buffer mode until the claim is released. Normal buffer updates take
> info_exist_lock followed by mlock in iio_update_buffers().
>
> However, iio_device_unregister() disables and deactivates all buffers
> without taking mlock. This can invalidate buffer state, including
> active_scan_mask, while a buffer-mode claim is held.
>
> Take mlock in iio_disable_all_buffers() so that unregister honors the
> mode-claim lifetime guarantee. The info_exist_lock -> mlock ordering
> matches iio_update_buffers().
>
> Fixes: 0a8565425afd ("iio: core: introduce iio_device_{claim|release}_buffer_mode() APIs")
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jinseob Kim <kimjinseob88@gmail.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 2c9ec93dff47..d60bad5492e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -1377,6 +1377,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_update_buffers);
>
> void iio_disable_all_buffers(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> + struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&iio_dev_opaque->mlock);
> +
> iio_disable_buffers(indio_dev);
> iio_buffer_deactivate_all(indio_dev);
> }
>
> base-commit: dceba8e581e3e8f475da0efbd7a73f3d9524ddd2
> --
> 2.43.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 6:24 Jinseob Kim
2026-09-23 7:38 ` Joshua Crofts
2026-09-24 8:24 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arTeK0QadzWkI6jH@nsa \
--to=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kimjinseob88@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®