mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Pfeifroth <micpf@westermo.com>
To: Baochen Qiang <baochen.qiang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@kernel.org>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
	ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] wifi: ath11k: release peer accounting on peer delete timeout
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:14:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arTp/9A0iMNpIhl2@mpf-ESPRIMO-P9012> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d8307ee-e9bd-4538-92f8-b33410caecae@oss.qualcomm.com>

On some deployments access points intermittently stop accepting new
station associations after several hours of uptime with frequent
roaming/reconnects. The kernel logs

  ath11k_pci ....: failed to create peer due to insufficient peer entry resource in firmware

and hostapd reports "Could not add STA to kernel driver". A "wifi
down/up" (radio restart) on the affected radio restores service.

Despite the message text, this is not a firmware peer-table exhaustion.
The message is emitted by the driver-side gate in ath11k_peer_create():

	if (ar->num_peers > (ar->max_num_peers - 1))

i.e. the driver's own ar->num_peers accounting has leaked and reached
the ceiling. It is always preceded by a peer-delete that timed out:

  ath11k_pci ....: invalid vdev id in peer delete resp ev 1
  ath11k_pci ....: Timeout in receiving peer delete response
  ath11k_pci ....: failed to delete peer vdev_id .. addr .. ret -110

ath11k_peer_delete() only decrements ar->num_peers when
__ath11k_peer_delete() returns 0. On a delete timeout
__ath11k_peer_delete() returns -ETIMEDOUT, so the decrement is skipped
and one num_peers slot is leaked per event. After max_num_peers such
timeouts ath11k_peer_create() rejects every new station until the radio
is restarted.

In the observed case the peer-unmap event is received normally (there is
no "failed wait for peer deleted" log), so ath11k_peer_unmap_event() has
already removed the peer from ab->peers and freed it; only the num_peers
counter is left wrong. The delete-response completion is missed because
the response event is dropped in ath11k_peer_delete_resp_event() when
ath11k_mac_get_ar_by_vdev_id() cannot resolve the vdev ("invalid vdev id
in peer delete resp ev"), so ar->peer_delete_done is never signalled and
the second wait in ath11k_wait_for_peer_delete_done() times out.

Return success from __ath11k_peer_delete() on the timeout path so that
ath11k_peer_delete() releases the num_peers slot. As a safety net also
drop the local peer if it is still on the list; that only happens in the
other timeout case, where ath11k_wait_for_peer_deleted() itself timed out
and no unmap event removed the peer. The peer has already been removed
from the rhash earlier in __ath11k_peer_delete(), so only the list
removal and free remain, mirroring ath11k_peer_unmap_event(). A late
unmap event would then simply fail to find the peer id and log a harmless
warning instead of touching freed memory.

The problem was reproduced deterministically with an out-of-tree debug
patch that adds module parameters to force
ath11k_wait_for_peer_delete_done() to return -ETIMEDOUT and to cap
max_num_peers: after max_num_peers such deletes the AP permanently
rejects new stations, and with this change it keeps accepting them.

Fixes: 690ace20ff79 ("ath11k: peer delete synchronization with firmware")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michael Pfeifroth <micpf@westermo.com>
---
v2:
 - Correct the root-cause description: the peer-unmap event is received
   normally, so the peer is already freed; only the num_peers counter
   leaks (Baochen Qiang).
 - Explain that the missed delete-response completion is due to the event
   being dropped on an unresolved vdev id, replacing the vague
   "misrouted" wording.
 - Rework the code comment and switch to netdev comment style.
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c
index b30a906..f93a8da 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c
@@ -341,8 +341,21 @@ static int __ath11k_peer_delete(struct ath11k *ar, u32 vdev_id, const u8 *addr)
 	}
 
 	ret = ath11k_wait_for_peer_delete_done(ar, vdev_id, addr);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	if (ret) {
+		/*
+		 * The delete timed out. The peer is normally already freed by
+		 * the unmap event; drop it here only if it is still on the
+		 * list. Either way return success so that ath11k_peer_delete()
+		 * releases the num_peers slot instead of leaking it.
+		 */
+		spin_lock_bh(&ab->base_lock);
+		peer = ath11k_peer_find(ab, vdev_id, addr);
+		if (peer) {
+			list_del(&peer->list);
+			kfree(peer);
+		}
+		spin_unlock_bh(&ab->base_lock);
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.34.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-22 12:25 [PATCH] " Michael Pfeifroth
2026-09-24  7:29 ` Baochen Qiang
2026-09-24  9:13   ` Michael Pfeifroth
2026-09-24  9:14   ` Michael Pfeifroth [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arTp/9A0iMNpIhl2@mpf-ESPRIMO-P9012 \
    --to=micpf@westermo.com \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=baochen.qiang@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®