From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DBED30C345; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790249258; cv=none; b=tfeJEgTWEzVG7daKP1H3EiaF6nPQd1P5Heuf8nCo84fKy0IGIw7GnfU7eXTchtQoefdbGKFB6mFS/pLd1loMFvLQMqUWpIiBig0UZ3Zfz47+7TLLOk/KpfS3IBtPwzoSwCel57ZobxBpNv2NCOAwqGHSD6oGLWdKBXDAs0fdtXA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790249258; c=relaxed/simple; bh=my6DpkZnBQtVPsMZV958YS2Tf7S/W8fX5yNlP388xko=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=n04sPaLKFT3o9OkQrRZNPoW/iW5InAaHiT+5RXAwmhb80gTghpANMgsHsYnGVxt3ANfJLxDyTnwgTiOfyoOmh2rVJrDDnjKnIzKI0bKHCALVNgSjml+VCZTaZFCZ5czKLBj3+jtxA3Sqp2q23YEd3rrDSYbKp8N4e7NTIR6a6+E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ecn7jO/n; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ecn7jO/n" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 3D9971F000FF; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 11:27:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790249256; bh=iABVPZWcBTmmLrZa/3dbULJ4srFGX/7UR65lciVwmhY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ecn7jO/nYvPKT3dB6gSYhIzWf5LY8dMuY+MRYbecv0RYyJCYvGNVVi+yThqx0uuKK pJEd47+Tfa14imJGNZMcChV3qIvCfZrxM+CqOr8GbNriUayBWsxvl2Ham87btG3rxn 3Vvp0vLguUniUsJ+nzPsxdve9vkjD/bdl/fA9Y9ew3j0vsAOQn+i7Enkaf4g5fjhyk Upba6zeAdi0Z5pFbJ2DWNRVLEQEQ5nGyl3vJbk7gWNyeEdJLsCnEz92vL5gadq9eJ3 CqMM6fFdB4q002qVr4xOj2J85NrN+Y3iJLiw7f9VrHIvhotrWzJ+k/npXSXhH6RVMm diatNt0Oneu0Q== Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 14:27:32 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Peter Huewe , Li Jun , Arnd Bergmann , Jason Gunthorpe , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: remove extraneous #ifdef Message-ID: References: <20260915201305.3529682-1-arnd@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 07:44:30AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Jarkko, > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 04:05:22AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 04:01:57AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > I pushed this to for-next-tpm, which mirrors to linux-next. > > I don't spot it in > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git for-next-tpm > > , do I look at the wrong tree? > > > > However, since this is -next only bug, I guess I should squash these to > > > the original commit? > > > > > > Just sanity checking before taking action :-) > > > > My suggestion would be to amend Co-authored-by to the original commit > > message as two bug fixes is significant amount of effort to make the > > change right. > > I don't care much about my Tested-by: tag, so feel free to drop it. > Promoting that to a Tested-by: on the squashed commit is wrong for sure. > > Best regards > Uwe Sorry I had my tree in bad state as per syncing with remotes. I now squashed fix to the original commit from Li. Br, Jarkko