From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C538B3D9665; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790269800; cv=none; b=dMcrfK0RQhkT/nmv5MUshIrcK8Ksc15O3NYw22SB0qywNxHUk2kq4ruOtPQUO7HBUedm+PJ7BkDlHqGuo+TWZ2BpM83xAxmnB5x8abafUl4DoRTIpdtXiI3vozRY2k8OcPqoTljIOkDLAzJFE4JkqOxcU/orUY4j7AnsmS50QC0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790269800; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XTqaO9MrJ/IvZRYs4uzLv5veDPlD2xKflY5/ApelDA0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QHLn9YzjM06Efd40lIgSrxq01AzO4xjydBZjvHwWn41hAv21WWOIb2iU0PBDRsDw674Y/AqWvcf6fYDOY5DtJAMZMv3GRh8XgplYEldpWNmmoAwqp7toUqXPsZe3RTSC+QNJTwVmq63lDDbg0Qiujawk034ae+pPxNFte7fCcp8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bIYvBYM5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bIYvBYM5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C0A91F000FF; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:09:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790269798; bh=3BBAbR054arD3ru3ZfA5MXSP3f4EpL7YgDzUT/PAMvo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=bIYvBYM5/zR85IZ7yxSSOmlwQFy5gftzsHRSmtIE8/EY952DZ3RtSlYh4qXosPmKO 5W+6N3UxT/CLzF2Tksi13KisXCrJACutg84cRsHQ0rrJ30ywWWubioEl0hdQTVPeN/ mNy6/R8cu3T0kxbzaOkaRmfLpxWu11zFjj84/wRQuh7fFxqKlZ3T/y/DhfbGu/56P0 Rtj2AquWMuBUgL55Er133ETh61HxXf0yBDc87hNbuenBBigsEVgZ0Div4zgdraGTdN 5oCnp+PhDDgjIOHJ2dScGIHxXngGZgWYQ7oFDlWh/LnyxMTRLT/6n7to5wkG6jBGTz 8XWuPE+Ke2mzw== Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:09:56 +0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Stian Halseth , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Andreas Larsson , "David S. Miller" , Mark Rutland , Jiri Olsa , Alexander Shishkin , Adrian Hunter , James Clark , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , Magnus Lindholm , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] perf: sparc64 user regs and stack dump, with arch hooks Message-ID: References: <20260923090429.2026529-1-stian@itx.no> <4927bb40f34ec6d3d5591dabba755452bd6b4a39.camel@itx.no> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 02:16:49PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 1:57 PM Stian Halseth wrote: > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > On Wed, 2026-09-23 at 13:38 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > > > > > > For the series: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers > > > > > > > Since this series is still marked RFC, should I resend it as a regular > > PATCH v4 with your Reviewed-by, or wait for additional maintainer > > feedback? > > > > And thank you so much for the reviews! > > I think we have everything we need but the kernel changes are really > up to Peter and Ingo, and the tool changes are up to Arnaldo and > Namhyung. Exactly, as soon as the kernel changes land in a path to upstream, I can do the same for the tooling bits. Cheers, - Arnaldo