From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C968BBA34; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790271533; cv=none; b=UGDbbEe+xhj8WEye1Hybi2FZeQzH6g/+4RtV/kwNG088Bo3uMB3z6OxMR+ioTngRmO1T65rykQQwxkbrPjCQXLezt8xIpYmGEiZTJptRa9uPsUioQJuqYgxPTMRe1DnFNe8YnYRNV42d8Jf5ehHx53gHoi1YmTw3HeZ2bMaRcYo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790271533; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kBdfCMbhqBUgKgsL6tmY2Qg7Kej8fo5oBpY5/dOJNNQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=QG2cp/8Xm9G3xFy0b0YylBmY8Qw+BkX5ap0P3cORQkLX669Mk64jnOBPFUD1P7ndtb0uQvyj7TBg4z0ntBOznC0jbzPoj7wOP3ke+KQ/oBYK7lpIvb4Lzo04PEcx+N7nXPWKJtTSvgeT5PKf2vzLiHKR4JDVUsH1bZuiF6MQ+Z4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=os85GjL2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="os85GjL2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3BC91F000FF; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:38:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790271531; bh=gaDMnY09PB18FPHraAkmxxFVSs3vEWSrI+whk9nZC6c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=os85GjL2NhGiS7HO1BwuhKhHxnPqRkMa69apFY5sy/yFu3wYWcrXsK+8PjcEMUpjn xDqzd/bH/+0+pd7fqimpwaHGeNmJWkikJoWB/IH7Qo6pbOR858EougKZZ2Sw5Ny98K HSGtxZFokT5HYjnQTb3KtjwPmBtECj6cziYDbRGZnD4xbk08R+Ag8TpDmjJjUDSJln KveJi5Y26zT9R27cxV3P37zBGNArRkhcC2UAeGnyojSxUPSbLJ1KGXSZBLaI7WQNA+ WpXvQnPxfvwg+vrntaJMjE2Cc8TKCIP/VaprJ+9Aiqwh3tZu+jTDix42JI4Bm0UtcA z9NzfvTpiFuLw== Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:38:48 +0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Christian Melendez , namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: document task-clock/cpu-clock in TIMINGS Message-ID: References: <20260923135140.386033-1-chrismelnu@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 08:14:09AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 6:52 AM Christian Melendez wrote: > > > > task-clock/cpu-clock appear in perf stat's own example output but > > were never explained in perf-stat.txt, unlike time elapsed/user/sys. > > This came up unanswered on the list in 2013 and 2015 without docs > > ever being added. > > > > Link: https://patch.msgid.link/CAP-5=fV0-yvc68BUSKoSajHjHY_A6COgbEJYiFxRg+G-8LeJhQ@mail.gmail.com > > Signed-off-by: Christian Melendez > > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next, for v7.4. - Arnaldo