mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/11] driver core: platform: Add static ACPI nodes IRQ retrieval/mapping code
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 12:54:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arZEx0113s0bbkXJ@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260925-acpi-static-table-irq-probe-defer-v1-3-2c62125d0085@kernel.org>

On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 09:48:02AM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> ACPI static fwnodes types are not contemplated in the current
> 
> platform_get_irq_affinity()
> 
> implementation that is there to retrieve and map IRQs for a device.
> 
> Add fwnode_irq_get() to platform_get_irq_affinity() for static ACPI fwnodes
> to overcome this shortcoming, enabling IRQ retrieval and mapping for the
> ACPI static fwnode type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
> ---

Same about the Cc list...

...

> +	if (is_acpi_static_node(fwnode)) {
> +		ret = fwnode_irq_get(fwnode, num);
> +		if (ret > 0 || ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			goto out;
> +	}

This even doesn't sound right. If you know this is an ACPI-only feature what
the fwnode has all to do with it? Call the respective ACPI-oriented function.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-25  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-25  7:47 [PATCH RFC 00/11] ACPI: ARM64: Implement IRQ mapping probe deferral for static table devices Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  7:48 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] ACPI: irq: Return -EPROBE_DEFER on missing IRQ domain Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  9:45   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-25  7:48 ` [PATCH RFC 02/11] ACPI: Introduce irq_get() for static fwnodes Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  9:49   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-25 10:30     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25 10:54       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-25 11:32         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  7:48 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] driver core: platform: Add static ACPI nodes IRQ retrieval/mapping code Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  9:54   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-09-25 10:16     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  7:48 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer_mmio: Dispose IRQ mappings on probe failure Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  9:52   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-25  7:48 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer_mmio: Implement arch mem timer deferred probe Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  7:48 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] ACPI: GTDT: Convert SBSA watchdog to IRQ properties Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  9:56   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-25  7:48 ` [PATCH RFC 07/11] ACPI/IORT: Convert IORT devices to IRQs software-node properties Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  7:48 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] watchdog: sbsa: Handle IRQ probe deferral Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  7:48 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] iommu/arm-smmu: Add arm-smmu IRQ mapping -EPROBE_DEFER handling Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  7:48 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-09-25  7:48 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] perf/arm-smmu-v3-pmu: " Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arZEx0113s0bbkXJ@ashevche-desk.local \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®