mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	"Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfs: Fix missing alloc tagging of direct mempool allocations
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 22:28:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arn7FHZpYhNDvjIS@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d798541-6486-44ff-ae57-f631d1465688@kernel.org>

On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 11:36:19AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0b004319-9ef7-437c-a4dd-174d6a9a83db@mailbox.org/
> > Tested-by: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
> > Suggested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
> 
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> 
> Seems ok enough as a hotfix. The naming perhaps isn't ideal, we have
> mempool_alloc_preallocated() already for the opposite case. Maybe
> mempool_alloc_no_preallocated() to complement it? Rather long though.

None of this is ok.  Directly alling into mempool->alloc, using a
wrapper and not is stupid and broken.  Just switch the code to use
mempool_alloc undconditionally or to use a manually
kmalloc/kmem_cache_allow if the subsystem has a really good reason
to not use a mempool for non-writeback requests, but it'd better be
a really good and well-documented reason.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23  6:37 Hao Ge
2026-09-24  9:36 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-09-28  5:28   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-09-25 15:30 ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arn7FHZpYhNDvjIS@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=erhard_f@mailbox.org \
    --cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®