mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,  "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhong Wang <wangzhong.c0ss4ck@bytedance.com>,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Rebuild MSR bitmap after eVMCS control changes
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 09:03:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arqP4TM9pRTw7SOG@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260926063721.1471741-1-bestswngs@gmail.com>

On Sat, Sep 26, 2026, Weiming Shi wrote:
> The Enlightened MSR Bitmap shortcut reuses vmcs02's bitmap when L1 marks
> MSR_BITMAP clean, but the bitmap also depends on execution controls in
> CONTROL_GRP1 and CONTROL_PROC.  L1 can change either group while leaving
> MSR_BITMAP clean, preserving stale APIC_TASKPRI passthrough for L2.
> 
> Reusing the bitmap after a failed rebuild is unsafe too.  The failed entry
> disables hardware MSR bitmaps, but KVM subsequently marks the eVMCS clean,
> allowing the next entry to reactivate the old vmcs02 bitmap.
> 
> Require both control groups to be clean before reusing the bitmap, and keep
> force_msr_bitmap_recalc set until a rebuild succeeds.
> 
> Fixes: 502d2bf5f2fd ("KVM: nVMX: Implement Enlightened MSR Bitmap feature")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Zhong Wang <wangzhong.c0ss4ck@bytedance.com>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>

Fix already posted[*] and applied (I cheated a bit and sent it to Paolo off-list
a while back).

[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260926053253.195597-7-pbonzini@redhat.com

> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 151873407abd3..0f0e677d99482 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -755,13 +755,17 @@ static inline bool nested_vmx_prepare_msr_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		struct hv_enlightened_vmcs *evmcs = nested_vmx_evmcs(vmx);
>  
>  		if (evmcs && evmcs->hv_enlightenments_control.msr_bitmap &&
> -		    evmcs->hv_clean_fields & HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_MSR_BITMAP)
> +		    evmcs->hv_clean_fields & HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_MSR_BITMAP &&
> +		    evmcs->hv_clean_fields & HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_CONTROL_GRP1 &&
> +		    evmcs->hv_clean_fields & HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_CONTROL_PROC)
>  			return true;
>  	}
>  
>  	CLASS(kvm_vcpu_map_local_readonly, m)(vcpu, gpa_to_gfn(vmcs12->msr_bitmap));
> -	if (m.ret)
> +	if (m.ret) {
> +		vmx->nested.force_msr_bitmap_recalc = true;

Copy+pasting a comment I made off-list in reponse to a suggestion to fix this as
you propose here (though you obviously caught the early return issue I pointed out):

 : Hmm, I like the idea from a "what's logical", but it's wildly unsafe.  Even if we
 : fixed all of the paths that could cause problems (and there are a lot), the code
 : would be extremely brittle, i.e. we'd always be at a higher risk of reintroducing
 : the bug.
 : 
 : Specifically, if nested_vmx_prepare_msr_bitmap() doesn't run to completion and
 : actually update the bitmaps, then L1 can re-run L2 in the future *without*
 : changing the control fields, and once again consume the stale bitmap.  E.g. if
 : CPU_BASED_USE_MSR_BITMAPS is clear, if hv_enlightenments_control.msr_bitmap is
 : disabled, if mapping vmcs12->msr_bitmap fails, or most problematically, if
 : anything between updating the control fields in copy_enlightened_to_vmcs12()
 : causes KVM to bail from nested VM-Enter.  The window for that last one could be
 : shrinked by detecting control changes in prepare_vmcs02_early(), but there would
 : still be a bug.
 : 
 : In other words, the only input from L1 that can be safely consumed on-demand
 : HV_VMX_ENLIGHTENED_CLEAN_FIELD_MSR_BITMAP, because that's L1's responsibility to
 : get right.  For everything else, KVM needs to well and truly force an update
 : when *KVM* detects a need to update the bitmaps.

Thanks for the fix though!

>  		return false;
> +	}
>  
>  	msr_bitmap_l1 = (unsigned long *)m.map.hva;
>  
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-26  6:37 Weiming Shi
2026-09-28 16:03 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arqP4TM9pRTw7SOG@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangzhong.c0ss4ck@bytedance.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®