From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Igor Paunovic <royalnet026@gmail.com>,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: ensure PHY is running when clock is requested
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 20:00:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arqnn8s5yFmZzQvG@venus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xnvakstneih6njyxfe27kdx54vy3zpnth24o4mjlzuoykb2pfh@np7dx62waujo>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3374 bytes --]
Hello Mani,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2026 at 04:50:07AM +0200, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 06:07:42PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On RK3588 the OHCI controller registers can only be accessed when the
> > PHY's 480MHz clock is running. After system suspend the controller is
> > resumed before the PHY.
>
> This statement is slightly confusing. There is no PM ops in this
> PHY driver.
I will take a closer look how it is powered off during suspend.
Generally I expect it to loose state in any case as the related
power domain should be disabled.
> > The controller requests the clock, which opens
> > the gate in the PHY's clock prepare function. But with the PHY suspended
> > this just results in a dead clock being routed. The OHCI driver will
> > then continue to access its registers resulting in a board hang.
> >
> > Fix this by resuming the suspended PHY in the clock's prepare function,
> > so that the clock is really prepared once the function returns.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > This was noticed on RK3588 EVB1 when resuming from system suspend. This
> > is technically a fix, but its unclear when the bug was introduced and
> > system suspend is broken on RK3588 for quite a while and not just due
> > to this problem. So I think this fix can be merged the normal way via
> > linux-next.
> > ---
> > drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> > index 7d8a533f24ae..07d400967def 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.c
> > @@ -332,6 +332,39 @@ rockchip_usb2phy_clk480m_clkout_ctl(struct clk_hw *hw, struct regmap **base,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static int rockchip_usb2phy_clk480m_leave_suspend(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > + struct rockchip_usb2phy *rphy = container_of(hw, struct rockchip_usb2phy, clk480m_hw);
> > + bool relock = false;
> > + int ret, i;
> > +
> > + /* Limit to single port; it's unclear how multi-port should be handled */
> > + if (rphy->phy_cfg->num_ports > 1)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < rphy->phy_cfg->num_ports; i++) {
> > + struct rockchip_usb2phy_port *rport = &rphy->ports[i];
> > + const struct rockchip_usb2phy_port_cfg *port_cfg = rport->port_cfg;
> > +
> > + if (!rport->phy || !port_cfg || !port_cfg->phy_sus.enable)
> > + continue;
> > + if (property_enabled(rphy->grf, &port_cfg->phy_sus)) {
> > + property_enable(rphy->grf, &port_cfg->phy_sus,
> > + false);
> > + relock = true;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (relock) {
> > + ret = rockchip_usb2phy_reset(rphy);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + usleep_range(1500, 2000);
> > + }
> > +
>
> This looks like a duplication of rockchip_usb2phy_power_on(). So I'm assuming
> that phy_power_on() is not called by the OHCI driver before accessing the
> registers. So why don't you fix that instead?
I can look into it. My way of thinking was, that the clock should be
running independently of that when the clock has been requested via
common clock framework.
Greetings,
-- Sebastian
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 16:07 Sebastian Reichel
2026-09-08 16:29 ` Igor Paunovic
2026-09-26 2:50 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-09-28 18:00 ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
2026-09-29 14:44 ` Sebastian Reichel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arqnn8s5yFmZzQvG@venus \
--to=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=royalnet026@gmail.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®