From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: use assign_bit() where applicable
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 17:58:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arsNUfVv0NhKZ6zT@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920022649.3145701-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
On Sun, Sep 20, 2026, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> Convert open-coded if/else with set_bit/clear_bit and their
> non-atomic __set_bit/__clear_bit variants to the assign_bit/__assign_bit
> API.
...
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 12 ++++--------
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c | 6 ++----
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 +++--------
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index 8d2669d8ef34..c131d9a3c550 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -114,17 +114,13 @@ static void synic_update_vector(struct kvm_vcpu_hv_synic *synic,
> if (vector < HV_SYNIC_FIRST_VALID_VECTOR)
> return;
>
> - if (synic_has_vector_connected(synic, vector))
> - __set_bit(vector, synic->vec_bitmap);
> - else
> - __clear_bit(vector, synic->vec_bitmap);
> + __assign_bit(vector, synic->vec_bitmap,
> + synic_has_vector_connected(synic, vector));
>
> auto_eoi_old = !bitmap_empty(synic->auto_eoi_bitmap, 256);
>
> - if (synic_has_vector_auto_eoi(synic, vector))
> - __set_bit(vector, synic->auto_eoi_bitmap);
> - else
> - __clear_bit(vector, synic->auto_eoi_bitmap);
> + __assign_bit(vector, synic->auto_eoi_bitmap,
> + synic_has_vector_auto_eoi(synic, vector));
Am I the only one that finds the assign_bit() code signficantly harder to follow?
Maybe it's just that I haven't seen assign_bit() much, but I've come back to this
patch several times, and I've had the same reaction every time. IMO, this is a
solution looking for a problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 2:26 Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-09-29 0:58 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-09-29 1:12 ` Peng Fan
2026-09-29 8:15 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arsNUfVv0NhKZ6zT@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®