From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5974E51AFFF; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 13:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790689123; cv=none; b=awAG67Hvgg6SiwOyP08JPtK5/c/0Pj1sijQSaoD3Fe6G46+31fJH8d+bNZWf0NfFrwyD6QNpSaSfmA2CGKqTGQxUgp++8ClXVn4kIUSeNMoWetTRwNzoGf+wj0DYLBBHktKnthv8TbRPm9yiVFvsYiOiyCIXmKw2LlU118gTyuM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790689123; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zQCyGzpYwxLTDRlBhx1tKupjPECIqz+qDOBOJIZIxNY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=g3pLV/geH+KKo3D9epbHFliOblpPCFRVt3eEyIi4RknKII4H2Mhm+fpDPstfTt0e4wItPj6W9DR4x4cfnjhNJN1ab61oOrnPx4XcilTKGY4jEs4tmMduCB3hI7PftQep6aLF65I8vqEnQm6fblpoOdHX7jFpzQvfGTxPEeViurU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=RD5vCO98; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="RD5vCO98" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057561476; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:38:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F25CF3F85F; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 06:38:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1790689120; bh=zQCyGzpYwxLTDRlBhx1tKupjPECIqz+qDOBOJIZIxNY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RD5vCO98mXKItVUoURri5HZC9gg/uYFp4dN7BYSWfXxJ9qVVo5x9UhjB28MzfSr72 TECmZoEA2PVfEGm61kdv5UbS0fa1/n8ej7LnJ0692LSopqgt1Hyr5TH5n+9gfaK94c R6ZdhW+V2B9uzMbVuC6MWcwsKdHXgk6WAjRGEj0E= Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 14:38:31 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Mark Brown Cc: Konrad Dybcio , Bjorn Andersson , Andy Gross , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the qcom tree with the arm64 tree Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 12:53:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the qcom tree got a conflict in: > > include/linux/mod_devicetable.h > > between commit: > > fe7f2a8054433 ("firmware: smccc: Add an Arm SMCCC bus") > > from the arm64 tree and commit: > > fe7f2a8054433 ("firmware: smccc: Add an Arm SMCCC bus") > > from the qcom tree. Why does the qcom tree carry these patches? I have a stable branch if they need them. -- Catalin