From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ublk: fix dispatch to canceled io commands
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:44:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arvOwDHOgvpVW86j@fedora-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928-b4-ublk-cancel-stop-v1-0-4a4360232a46@toxicpanda.com>
Hi Josef,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 04:00:36PM +0000, Josef Bacik wrote:
> ublk can dispatch a block request to an io command which is completed
> already, and the kernel oopses in ublk_queue_rq() on a NULL io->cmd.
> Before commit f7700a4415af ("ublk: fix use-after-free in
> ublk_cancel_cmd()") it is a freed io_uring request instead. Commit
> 1133b93fc7f6 ("ublk: set canceling flag even when disk is not
> allocated") fixed the io_uring exit route before the first start.
> These are the routes next to it:
>
> 1. STOP_DEV on a device which is ready but not started, then
> START_DEV. ublk_stop_dev() cancels the fetched commands after
> dropping ub->mutex, without marking the queues as canceling.
It looks two races: STOP_DEV vs. START_DEV, STOP_DEV vs. FETCH.
Looks fast io path shouldn't be touched for fixing the races.
> 2. A partial FETCH round whose task exits, once another task
> completes the round.
> 3. During recovery, the task of a queue which is ready already
> exiting before the last queue is ready.
2 and 3 could be solved in single simpler patch by making use of the
ub->canceling flag, and it is easier for backport.
From 83d95ff6f06ad71705e2432ffc58971bec0ec648 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:25:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ublk: keep a canceled FETCH round canceling until the server
is gone
A cancel completes a fetched io command and sets io->cmd to NULL, but
the io still counts as ready. Only ubq->canceling stops ublk_queue_rq()
from using the NULL io->cmd. Two paths clear that flag too early:
partial FETCH round recovery, two queues
------------------- --------------------
task A: FETCH tags 0-2 q0 ready: q0->canceling = false
task A exits: q0 task exits:
start_cancel(): mark queues start_cancel(): ub->canceling
tags 0-2: io->cmd = NULL is still set -> q0 not marked
task B: FETCH tag 3 q0: io->cmd = NULL
queue ready: canceling = false q1 ready
START_DEV END_USER_RECOVERY
read -> ublk_queue_cmd(NULL) read on q0 -> ublk_queue_cmd(NULL)
A FETCH round runs from the open of /dev/ublkcN until
ublk_reset_ch_dev() resets the queues. A canceled command can't be
fetched again in the same round. So the ready check only needs one
fact: did this round see a cancel? ub->canceling already records it:
ublk_start_cancel() sets it under cancel_mutex before any command is
taken. It is only cleared too early, when all queues are ready.
Fix:
- clear ub->canceling only in ublk_reset_ch_dev()
- when a queue gets ready, clear ubq->canceling only if ub->canceling
is not set, and check it under cancel_mutex
The check and the marking are ordered by cancel_mutex:
check first: queue cleared -> start_cancel() marks it again
-> command taken
cancel first: check sees ub->canceling -> queue stays canceling
While ub->canceling is set, no queue clears its flag. So the "all
queues marked" shortcut in ublk_start_cancel() is correct again.
Fixes: 728cbac5fe21 ("ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release()")
Fixes: 3f3850785594 ("ublk: fix batch I/O recovery -ENODEV error")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.17+: needs cancel_mutex
Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20260928-b4-ublk-cancel-stop-v1-0-4a4360232a46@toxicpanda.com/
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Assisted-by: LLM
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 66eb55e7162e..38ed7d0e3979 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -334,6 +334,11 @@ struct ublk_device {
u16 nr_queue_ready;
bool unprivileged_daemons;
struct mutex cancel_mutex;
+ /*
+ * A cancel started in this FETCH round. Set by ublk_set_canceling(),
+ * cleared only by ublk_reset_ch_dev() when a new round starts. While
+ * it is set, no queue clears its ->canceling.
+ */
bool canceling;
pid_t ublksrv_tgid;
struct delayed_work exit_work;
@@ -2415,6 +2420,11 @@ static void ublk_reset_ch_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
spin_unlock(&ubq->cancel_lock);
}
+ /* a new FETCH round starts, the queues stay canceling until ready */
+ mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ ub->canceling = false;
+ mutex_unlock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+
/* set to NULL, otherwise new tasks cannot mmap io_cmd_buf */
ub->mm = NULL;
ub->nr_queue_ready = 0;
@@ -3024,11 +3034,19 @@ static void ublk_reset_io_flags(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io)
}
/* reset per-queue io flags */
-static void ublk_queue_reset_io_flags(struct ublk_queue *ubq)
+static void ublk_queue_reset_io_flags(struct ublk_device *ub,
+ struct ublk_queue *ubq)
{
- spin_lock(&ubq->cancel_lock);
- ubq->canceling = false;
- spin_unlock(&ubq->cancel_lock);
+ /*
+ * A cancel in this FETCH round took a command which still counts as
+ * ready, so the queue has to stay canceling. ub->canceling is set
+ * under cancel_mutex before any command is taken: either we see it
+ * here, or the cancel marks this queue again later.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ if (!ub->canceling)
+ ubq->canceling = false;
+ mutex_unlock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
ubq->fail_io = false;
ubq->force_abort = false;
}
@@ -3051,24 +3069,17 @@ static void ublk_mark_io_ready(struct ublk_device *ub, u16 q_id,
ub->nr_queue_ready++;
/*
- * Reset queue flags as soon as this queue is ready.
- * This clears the canceling flag, allowing batch FETCH commands
- * to succeed during recovery without waiting for all queues.
+ * Reset queue flags as soon as this queue is ready. Unless
+ * this round saw a cancel, this clears the canceling flag,
+ * allowing batch FETCH commands to succeed during recovery
+ * without waiting for all queues.
*/
- ublk_queue_reset_io_flags(ubq);
+ ublk_queue_reset_io_flags(ub, ubq);
}
- /* Check if all queues are ready */
- if (ublk_dev_ready(ub)) {
- /*
- * All queues ready - clear device-level canceling flag
- * and wake ublk_dev_ready() waiters.
- */
- mutex_lock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
- ub->canceling = false;
- mutex_unlock(&ub->cancel_mutex);
+ /* All queues ready - wake ublk_dev_ready() waiters */
+ if (ublk_dev_ready(ub))
wake_up_var(&ub->nr_queue_ready);
- }
}
static inline int ublk_check_cmd_op(u32 cmd_op)
@@ -4433,9 +4444,10 @@ static bool ublk_validate_user_pid(struct ublk_device *ub, pid_t ublksrv_pid)
/*
* Wait until all queues have fetched their I/O commands, and return with
- * ub->mutex held and readiness guaranteed: then every queue's ->canceling
- * is cleared. Ready may regress between wakeup and mutex_lock() (F_BATCH
- * UNPREP, daemon death), so re-check it under the mutex and wait again.
+ * ub->mutex held and readiness guaranteed. The queues stay canceling if
+ * this round saw a cancel, see ublk_queue_reset_io_flags(). Ready may
+ * regress between wakeup and mutex_lock() (F_BATCH UNPREP, daemon death),
+ * so re-check it under the mutex and wait again.
*/
static int ublk_wait_dev_ready_and_lock(struct ublk_device *ub)
{
--
2.55.0
Thanks,
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 16:00 Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 16:00 ` [PATCH 1/9] ublk: keep queue canceling over canceled commands Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 16:46 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-09-28 18:34 ` Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 16:00 ` [PATCH 2/9] ublk: clear ub->canceling with the queue's own flag Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 16:00 ` [PATCH 3/9] ublk: publish io->cmd under io->lock in the commit paths Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 17:53 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2026-09-29 13:06 ` Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 16:00 ` [PATCH 4/9] ublk: read the io under io->lock in ublk_cancel_cmd() Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 16:00 ` [PATCH 5/9] ublk: complete a command canceled before it was marked from its issuer Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 16:00 ` [PATCH 6/9] ublk: split ublk_claim_cmd() out of ublk_cancel_cmd() Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 16:00 ` [PATCH 7/9] ublk: mark queues and command in one cancel_mutex hold Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 16:00 ` [PATCH 8/9] ublk: claim commands under ub->mutex in ublk_stop_dev() Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 16:00 ` [PATCH 9/9] ublk: refuse to go live over canceled io commands Josef Bacik
2026-09-28 17:35 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-09-29 14:44 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arvOwDHOgvpVW86j@fedora-laptop \
--to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®