From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@gmail.com>
Cc: apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com,
John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@canonical.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apparmor: handle NULL peer label in AF_UNIX context updates
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 20:54:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arwJUDS1vbUq_KKT@aurel32.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a2d420a1757516f1e9ad4e9a0e9f17b9ba92c72.1789628002.git.maciek.borzecki@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 2026-09-17 09:15, Maciek Borzecki wrote:
> When a confined process performs the first file permission revalidation on
> an AF_UNIX socket, both update_sk_ctx() and update_peer_ctx() can be called
> before the socket's peer label cache (ctx->peer) has been populated. In
> those cases they pass NULL as a label argument to aa_label_is_subset() or
> aa_label_merge(), which immediately dereferences label->size and causes an
> Oops:
>
> RIP: __aa_label_next_not_in_set+0xd/0x110
> CR2: 000000000000004c
> Call Trace:
> aa_label_is_subset
> aa_unix_file_perm
> aa_file_perm
> apparmor_file_permission
> security_file_permission
> rw_verify_area
> vfs_write
> ksys_write
>
> Observed on Arch Linux kernels 7.2.4-arch1-2 and 7.2.6-arch2-1, triggered
> by snapd unit tests writing to a connected AF_UNIX socket. The issue
> persists across those stable updates.
>
It appears to be the same issue as reported here:
https://bugs.debian.org/1145111
And a patch that looks similar to yours has already been posted:
https://lore.kernel.org/20260824155822.9214-1-maxime.belair@canonical.com
As it seems you have looked at the bug in details, you can maybe comment
it and add a Tested-by: and/or Reviewed-by:, that might help to make
things progress.
Regards
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 7:15 Maciek Borzecki
2026-09-29 18:54 ` Aurelien Jarno [this message]
2026-09-30 10:20 ` Fabian Grünbichler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arwJUDS1vbUq_KKT@aurel32.net \
--to=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=georgia.garcia@canonical.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciek.borzecki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®