mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
To: Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@gmail.com>
Cc: apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com,
	John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	Georgia Garcia <georgia.garcia@canonical.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apparmor: handle NULL peer label in AF_UNIX context updates
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 20:54:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arwJUDS1vbUq_KKT@aurel32.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a2d420a1757516f1e9ad4e9a0e9f17b9ba92c72.1789628002.git.maciek.borzecki@gmail.com>

Hi,

On 2026-09-17 09:15, Maciek Borzecki wrote:
> When a confined process performs the first file permission revalidation on
> an AF_UNIX socket, both update_sk_ctx() and update_peer_ctx() can be called
> before the socket's peer label cache (ctx->peer) has been populated. In
> those cases they pass NULL as a label argument to aa_label_is_subset() or
> aa_label_merge(), which immediately dereferences label->size and causes an
> Oops:
> 
>   RIP: __aa_label_next_not_in_set+0xd/0x110
>   CR2: 000000000000004c
>   Call Trace:
>     aa_label_is_subset
>     aa_unix_file_perm
>     aa_file_perm
>     apparmor_file_permission
>     security_file_permission
>     rw_verify_area
>     vfs_write
>     ksys_write
> 
> Observed on Arch Linux kernels 7.2.4-arch1-2 and 7.2.6-arch2-1, triggered
> by snapd unit tests writing to a connected AF_UNIX socket. The issue
> persists across those stable updates.
> 

It appears to be the same issue as reported here:
https://bugs.debian.org/1145111

And a patch that looks similar to yours has already been posted:
https://lore.kernel.org/20260824155822.9214-1-maxime.belair@canonical.com

As it seems you have looked at the bug in details, you can maybe comment 
it and add a Tested-by: and/or Reviewed-by:, that might help to make 
things progress.

Regards
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net                     http://aurel32.net

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-17  7:15 Maciek Borzecki
2026-09-29 18:54 ` Aurelien Jarno [this message]
2026-09-30 10:20 ` Fabian Grünbichler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arwJUDS1vbUq_KKT@aurel32.net \
    --to=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com \
    --cc=georgia.garcia@canonical.com \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciek.borzecki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®