From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 243FE46A618; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790757685; cv=none; b=aw9AS26xjyhQu9cSB+XoUV+2ZRs8y/dHB+VStEgyQCu0ofEsXqexyo7bVe8n64xEGAkbpySgfOBnkp5sYXqbLo/+MSaoyeC8mY1eNEn/3AurCrLXa6L7HgWHvPC7xB9ijuyGP1oyoU9u5uv7guBuhGG0dK9AfRt+8XX4hbAMmiA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790757685; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8u2gb3KMo67glqbPwoMMfM8CXuNu/lEjAWa4yVIksu0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qlpe2O+pJIlLBxIz3riK3DCHb+M/D712aBpaVhmEQ3dig82RCWZ7XaocIUhbjD/Cn8MRHFBsVusbzvdPXJcAXIeNMda7PBg+BfSb2Kcz9d+PMwvfkXsjP2S4duxDWbP755GiHkA5njQgwHjm5jVvMLSG8MbaQVcdBFD1C1LltBw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mhzhUa9u; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mhzhUa9u" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 309C81F000FF; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:41:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790757682; bh=sFCvsXZLdxLKdHXwpS2nWXBpKLwepoPfVilE5Kh5WMA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=mhzhUa9uS6ktb80BJuDJGmtAxdhIqUzAP/HXGJ7IC4X+tI8VvcgkCZyJtgdQx2F1r Wrle757SiP9fvECGBPdskTJcuCihZHNIm/GJhqcohJbrZB2acm3rOqVKdBesQcDel3 H5g3r9F32WcMdawUsIdP66lqstfbNKTT1MAPHwlZLn+LtqwQv8RCPfFpRGUam9zGqn F9lPkFmZw32empK7ClckYchozBtr3NMoeTGgUfu1WrZJ1OOOwgPU58lZziwN85tUul Sd7cFoXEFut1UZHCZ/WBLqsiKcQO1NHumtPIYYmPHhxLFt7tDRXPS0/g5bUvJUiaKX 6ozrSPKWxej9A== Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 09:41:16 +0100 From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Shuah Khan , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Fuad Tabba , Mark Rutland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] kselftest/arm64: Move exit calls out of fp-stress loads Message-ID: References: <20260901-arm64-fp-stress-kvm-v1-0-31bce995b49b@kernel.org> <20260901-arm64-fp-stress-kvm-v1-3-31bce995b49b@kernel.org> <636db593-b6b6-4338-b9b0-e87c54111d14@sirena.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <636db593-b6b6-4338-b9b0-e87c54111d14@sirena.org.uk> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 10:56:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 05:22:44PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 06:06:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > No functional change. > > > I don't think this is accurate, as you're changing the register into which a > > value is loaded (x0 instead of x1). > > > That seems to be correct to me, but worth calling out that you're fixing that up > > in the commit message and dropping this line. > > That's actually an unintentional bugfix, the original code just uses > whatever random value was in x0 as an exit code. Probably that was > non-zero so it all works out but still. Yeah absolutely, it seems that we just got lucky before with it which is slightly ludicrous :) -- Cheers, Lorenzo