From: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] KVM: selftests: arm64: Improve diagnostics from set_id_regs
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 16:40:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <as8x38o9taXgKZym@sm-arm-grace07> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929-kvm-arm64-set-id-regs-aarch64-v8-0-58aabe2c2fac@kernel.org>
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 05:16:51PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> While debugging issues related to aarch64 only systems I ran into
> speedbumps due to the lack of detail in the results reported when the
> guest register read and reset value preservation tests were run, they
> generated an immediately fatal assert without indicating which register
> was being tested. Update these tests to non-fatally report a standard
> kselftest result per register, making it much easier to see what the
> problem being reported is.
>
> A similar issue exists with the validation of the individual bitfields
> in registers due to the use of immediately fatal asserts. Update those
> asserts to be standard kselftest reports.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v8:
> - Convert another assert.
> - Link to v7: https://patch.msgid.link/20260901-kvm-arm64-set-id-regs-aarch64-v7-0-7b065b0bda9a@kernel.org
>
> Changes in v7:
> - Rebase onto v7.3-rc1.
> - Link to v6: https://patch.msgid.link/20260719-kvm-arm64-set-id-regs-aarch64-v6-0-724287f5f108@kernel.org
>
> Changes in v6:
> - Rebase onto v7.2-rc3.
> - Drop changes to handling of aarch32 related registers on 64 bit only
> systems, an in kernel solution is preferred for those.
I’ve reproduced the set_id_regs failure under QEMU with kvm-arm.mode=nested on
a host that supports AArch32. KVM advertises the NV-capable L1 vCPU as AArch64-only,
but aa32_id_visibility() still permits the inner KVM to expose ID_DFR0_EL1.CopDbg = 0xa
to the selftest vCPU. The test expects zero because it skips setting expected
values for AArch32 ID registers.
In v6 you mentioned preferring an in-kernel solution. What did you have in mind,
given that changing the value returned by GET_ONE_REG may affect the userspace ABI?
Thanks,
Itaru.
> - Use a define to count the non-test_regs registers.
> - Link to v5: https://patch.msgid.link/20260317-kvm-arm64-set-id-regs-aarch64-v5-0-a60f2b956e22@kernel.org
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Rebase onto v7.0-rc1.
> - Link to v4: https://patch.msgid.link/20260106-kvm-arm64-set-id-regs-aarch64-v4-0-c7ef4551afb3@kernel.org
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Correct check for 32 bit ID registers.
> - Link to v3: https://patch.msgid.link/20251219-kvm-arm64-set-id-regs-aarch64-v3-0-bfa474ec3218@kernel.org
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Rebase onto v6.19-rc1.
> - Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20251114-kvm-arm64-set-id-regs-aarch64-v2-0-672f214f41bf@kernel.org
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Add a fix for spurious failures with 64 bit only guests.
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20251030-kvm-arm64-set-id-regs-aarch64-v1-0-96fe0d2b178e@kernel.org
>
> ---
> Mark Brown (3):
> KVM: selftests: arm64: Report set_id_reg reads of test registers as tests
> KVM: selftests: arm64: Report register reset tests individually
> KVM: selftests: arm64: Make set_id_regs bitfield validity checks non-fatal
>
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: cee9395acd8043be0644b25c34bfa86623f2b935
> change-id: 20251028-kvm-arm64-set-id-regs-aarch64-ebb77969401c
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 16:16 Mark Brown
2026-09-29 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] KVM: selftests: arm64: Report set_id_reg reads of test registers as tests Mark Brown
2026-09-29 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] KVM: selftests: arm64: Report register reset tests individually Mark Brown
2026-09-29 16:16 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] KVM: selftests: arm64: Make set_id_regs bitfield validity checks non-fatal Mark Brown
2026-10-14 7:40 ` Itaru Kitayama [this message]
2026-10-14 10:32 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] KVM: selftests: arm64: Improve diagnostics from set_id_regs Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=as8x38o9taXgKZym@sm-arm-grace07 \
--to=itaru.kitayama@fujitsu.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®