From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Palla Raghunath <raghunathpalla.0209@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Yao Sang <sangyao@kylinos.cn>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Brigham Campbell <me@brighamcampbell.com>,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+b0910be96b7c31314822@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+2e02ccadb3c5522a5c59@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-multipath: revalidate head zones after unfreezing the head queue
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2026 09:56:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asDDSv8LFGefB8xw@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930062648.73871-1-raghunathpalla.0209@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 07:26:47AM +0100, Palla Raghunath wrote:
> When a namespace on a multipath controller is updated,
> nvme_update_ns_info() freezes the head disk queue, commits the new
> limits, and then calls nvme_mpath_revalidate_zones() before it
> unfreezes the queue again.
>
> That is the wrong way round for blk_revalidate_disk_zones(). It starts
> a limits update, which takes q->limits_lock, and it freezes the queue
> itself while updating the zone resources. The block layer takes
> limits_lock before freezing the queue, never the other way around, so
> calling it with the head queue already frozen reverses that order.
Thanks, applied to nvme-7.3.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-03 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 6:26 Palla Raghunath
2026-09-30 7:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-30 9:36 ` Yao Sang
2026-10-03 8:56 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asDDSv8LFGefB8xw@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=me@brighamcampbell.com \
--cc=raghunathpalla.0209@gmail.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sangyao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+2e02ccadb3c5522a5c59@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+b0910be96b7c31314822@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®