From: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@marvell.com>
To: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
<ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <hawk@kernel.org>,
<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <sdf@fomichev.me>, <sgoutham@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 net-next 0/2] octeontx2: mqprio bandwidth offload for NIX TX schedulers
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 08:28:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asMSSdIK6WBECcs_@rkannoth-OptiPlex-7090> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002103752.006a7648@pumpkin>
On 2026-10-02 at 15:07:52, David Laight (david.laight.linux@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Patch 1 converts PF/VF and representor flag access to atomic bitops.
> > Patch 2 depends on it for safe OTX2_FLAG_INTF_DOWN and OTX2_FLAG_PORT_UP
> > updates on asynchronous mbox paths and during the mqprio netdev bounce.
>
> Can't you just move those two flags to a separate structure member?
> In at least one place the code separately clears one and sets the other.
> That makes me think it should a a three-valued state not two bits.
>
> That would save all the expensive locked operations.
Thanks for your review.
I agree that atomizing the entire flags bitmap is broader than strictly required for the
mqprio/mbox concurrency: the cross-CPU hazard is otx2_sync_flags_from_rep() doing a non-atomic
read-modify-write on nic->flags while other CPUs update bits in the same word. Relocating
OTX2_FLAG_INTF_DOWN and OTX2_FLAG_PORT_UP (or restricting rep sync so it cannot clobber those
bits) would be a narrower approach than converting every OTX2_FLAG_* accessor to
set_bit()/clear_bit().
On the three-valued model: INTF_DOWN and PORT_UP are not a single FSM in the driver today.
INTF_DOWN reflects netdev teardown and is consulted from NAPI completion etc.
PORT_UP is set and cleared from rep RVU_EVENT_PORT_STATE in the mbox up-handler and
suppresses a duplicate carrier/queue bring-up in otx2_handle_link_event() when rep has already
applied port state. Combinations such as INTF_DOWN set after otx2_stop() while PORT_UP remains
set are deliberate, so folding the two bits into one enum would need a seperate work
and review beyond this series.
please note that this restructuring feels somewhat orthogonal to the goals of the
current series. Patch 1 focuses on replacing the non-atomic |=/&=~ operations on the
stop/open and mbox paths with atomic bitops for INTF_DOWN/PORT_UP, which patch 2's netdev
bounce depends on. The rep-flag sync behavior in otx2_sync_flags_from_rep() is a related but
separate concern, and I'd prefer to address the lifecycle-bit layout and sync logic in a
dedicated follow-up rather than expand the scope of this patch series.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 2:29 Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-09-29 2:29 ` [PATCH v18 net-next 1/2] octeontx2: use atomic bitops for PF/VF and rep flags Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-10-02 8:31 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-05 4:16 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-09-29 2:29 ` [PATCH v18 net-next 2/2] octeontx2: add mqprio bandwidth offload for NIX TX schedulers Ratheesh Kannoth
2026-10-02 8:31 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-02 1:22 ` [PATCH v18 net-next 0/2] octeontx2: " Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-02 9:37 ` David Laight
2026-10-05 2:58 ` Ratheesh Kannoth [this message]
2026-10-05 8:14 ` David Laight
2026-10-05 9:49 ` Ratheesh Kannoth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asMSSdIK6WBECcs_@rkannoth-OptiPlex-7090 \
--to=rkannoth@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®