From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF123411F83; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 09:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791192973; cv=none; b=DbTAOTwxs1KR8/MWWu+IVVY3a7DOHXtGu9U7MIDtvrxwMdhQjzISiGjHJSzC1acJUmpqelafgKwtIroRodN3fAxOVUS5jgsvYFCSRfhlTQA0cMIj9agqVuPuF+XZQ2JT5qY5qSinvgrazk66B0ZMbieGMeSAXqIWQIrV4FzfWbY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791192973; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WwtwkI319utFrDtMTgBVWaxrm8/qwqTxwFJs3vTZvy4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=j/gPpxv94AtuVOXKkhXMECm9Y3H9iwS4NzBQqvToCxtv8KZtrvObbFVqnrocS+NjrDhFeHrbUn/Na14XdCoTPNqlEJysSysiHtijO/IMwHWSXHid29PxUIXU0K9mHKJ49qKuMq8qcgbbXv6q+4eKf4SuHnM6wQO7aP/208mF0SY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MkAVn3g+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MkAVn3g+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D67F1F00898; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 09:36:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791192963; bh=0Ao/mLNTjmSkWmcOamQdcSXL9pFAvIeKIenqzfFwDYE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=MkAVn3g+inmSBSz5Fzu0VGiuBrdRC72Erc14Fo1fRXNMasfI6jc0ioFi29XAC4WUb e0EMo8YHg0iO5T49/1QOyhu7gzVXYTKh1Ra03l2yI1N5pDAWyfWZGXnpgl/lkbc55/ /4VmY1qRBi0mp2CzzTYl2NnJxFED1hhZetH9teyAcddp5gm5QnYXPXWGJZV/4QHkia XAzd7keTIL4Jh5vl2AFjtM5xzaF+4ZrTujk54/pMK4cdJIWOLzKKLGhX8DTxGdD4zq Savyadu6JZABjEYih4G0DUtpL2Nxu0+8kPyqyfA9i5gEWMqPf/sl1/p+oNpRAfal6D EaRDByI2FZxmQ== Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 11:35:59 +0200 From: Vinod Koul To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde , Vincent Mailhol , Neil Armstrong , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Aswath Govindraju , linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Fixup unapplied constraint to ti,tcan1042 family Message-ID: References: <20260918110116.94024-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260918110116.94024-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com> On 18-09-26, 13:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > ti,tcan1042 is also used as fallback for a few devices, thus the check > in "if:" conditional should use "contains" to properly validate these > other devices. The other compatibles used in the changed enum are used > alone, so it does not affect them. looks duplicate of c7f2322431cb ("dt-bindings: phy: ti,tcan104x-can: Fix property constrains") ? if not please rebase on this and send -- ~Vinod