Re: [PATCH v13 0/3] airoha: an7581: USB support

[Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>]

On 05-10-26, 17:31, Christian Marangi (Ansuel) wrote:
> Il giorno lun 5 ott 2026 alle ore 17:28 Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> ha scritto:
> >
> > On 05-10-26, 12:55, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > This is a major rework of the old v2 series.
> > >
> > > The SoC always support USB 2.0 but for USB 3.0 it needs additional
> > > configuration for the Serdes port. Such port can be either configured
> > > for USB usage or for PCIe lines or HSGMII and these are configured
> > > in the SCU space.
> > >
> > > The previous implementation of a dedicated SSR driver was too
> > > complex and fragile for the simple task of configuring a register
> > > hence it was dropped and the handling is entirely in the PHY driver.
> > >
> > > Everything was reducted to the dt-bindings to describe the Serdes line.
> > >
> > > Also the property for the PHY are renamed to a more suitable name and
> > > everything is now mandatory to simplify the implementation.
> > > (the PHY are always present and active on the SoC)
> > >
> > > Also other unrelated patch are dropped from this series.
> > >
> > > Changes v13:
> > > - Rebase on top of phy next
> >
> > Pls fix the chechpatch issues. There is new blank line at EOF, SPDX
> > format mismatches and many more. Make sure you pass --strict flag to it
> >
> 
> My checkpatch doesn't report the blank line. Am I missing something?
> For SPDX, is it ok to change it? The commit just move file. I would
> like to fix that in a separate commit after. (I can include in this
> series if you
> want)

Yeah checkpatch wont. Git complains when i apply:

Applying: dt-bindings: phy: Add documentation for Airoha AN7581 USB PHY
.git/rebase-apply/patch:74: new blank line at EOF.
+

I think we should fix SPDX ones.

> The other warning are about Kconfig description where I can
> artificially make the help text longer (no idea if it's OK...)

That one is okay, I this description is fine

> And the line too long for the define but making the line shorter
> would result in a disaster for the register.
> 
> Up to you what I should fix but I guess the real important one
> is the blank line but my checkpatch script is not detecting that...

Yep, line and SPDX ones are important. long line splitting will make
code worse to read, i care more about readablity more..

-- 
~Vinod