mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Bradley Morgan <brads@mainlining.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] softirq: Preserve interrupt context during IRQ exit
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 12:00:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <asTG09Me93-zP3aG@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930191432.62760-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com>

Hi Karl,

Le Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 09:14:32PM +0200, Karl Mehltretter a écrit :
> +static inline bool softirq_handle_begin(void)
>  {
> -	__local_bh_disable_ip(_RET_IP_, SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
> +	bool from_irq_exit = in_hardirq();
> +
> +	if (!from_irq_exit) {

Is this variable necessary?

> +		__local_bh_disable_ip(_RET_IP_, SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Only reached from irq_exit(), with HARDIRQ_OFFSET still set.
> +	 * Replace it with SOFTIRQ_OFFSET before handle_softirqs() enables
> +	 * interrupts. Use the raw operation to preserve the preemption
> +	 * disable location recorded by irq_enter_rcu(), and update lockdep
> +	 * directly.
> +	 */
> +	__preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET - SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
> +	lockdep_softirqs_off(_RET_IP_);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(irq_count() != SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
> +
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void softirq_handle_end(void)
> +static inline void softirq_handle_end(bool from_irq_exit)
>  {
> -	__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
> +	if (!from_irq_exit) {
> +		__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	lockdep_softirqs_on(_RET_IP_);
> +	__preempt_count_add(HARDIRQ_OFFSET - SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(irq_count() != HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void ksoftirqd_run_begin(void)
> @@ -758,10 +788,21 @@ static inline void __irq_exit_rcu(void)
>  		invoke_softirq();
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Wake the timer thread even if the interrupt hit a softirq or a
> +	 * section with BHs disabled. Only nested interrupts and NMIs are
> +	 * excluded.
> +	 */
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IRQ_FORCED_THREADING) && force_irqthreads() &&
> -	    local_timers_pending_force_th() && !(in_nmi() | in_hardirq()))
> +	    local_timers_pending_force_th() &&
> +	    (in_nmi() | hardirq_count()) == HARDIRQ_OFFSET)

NMIs shouldn't ever take this path, right?

>  		wake_timersd();
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * tick_irq_exit() relies on in_hardirq() being false for the
> +	 * outermost interrupt.
> +	 */
> +	preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
>  	tick_irq_exit();

Can we also extend the HARDIRQ_OFFSET context coverage to tick_irq_exit() ?
From a quick look I haven't found anything that would prevent from that. You just need
to turn the "if (!in_hardirq())" test to "if hardirq_count()) == HARDIRQ_OFFSET"

Thanks.

-- 
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-06 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-30 19:14 Karl Mehltretter
2026-10-01  7:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-03  0:50 ` Joel Fernandes
2026-10-06 10:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=asTG09Me93-zP3aG@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=brads@mainlining.org \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®