From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@canonical.com>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Jason Miu <jasonmiu@google.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>,
regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] KHO handover hangs when memmap reserves PMEM
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 12:55:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asTTo3AFzQoqZLoP@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <asE0R_f2r2TL-3Sy@px13>
On Sat, Oct 03, 2026 at 06:02:27PM +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am reporting a regression in KHO handover.
>
> In the most recent Ubuntu 26.10 beta mini-ISO releases (2026-09-18 onwards),
> the first kernel reserves RAM for the downloaded ISO with a memmap directive
> such as memmap=<size>!4G, then kexecs a second kernel. On affected kernels, the
> first kernel reaches "kexec_core: Starting new kernel", but the second kernel
> produces no further output and QEMU spins at 100% CPU. On unaffected kernels,
> the second kernel starts and finds /dev/pmem0 with the expected "Persistent
> Memory (legacy)" range in /proc/iomem.
TO make sure I understand this correctly, you enable KHO in the builds of
the installer kernel and then the installer command line explicitly enables
KHO.
Is there anything you actually preserve with KHO when kexec'ing the second
kernel?
> A source bisect identified 3f2ad90060f6 ("kho: adopt radix tree for preserved
> memory tracking") as the first bad commit; reverting it at the bisected
> revision restored the handover. The regression appears related to KHO metadata
> being accessed after the receiving kernel's memmap directive changes how the
> metadata's physical range is mapped.
>
> #regzbot introduced: 3f2ad90060f6
>
> I have an AI-generated candidate fix that changes 22 files. I have not attached
> or published it: although the AI did extensive verification on both x64 and
> arm64, I cannot review or explain the complete change, so I am not submitting
> it as a fix. If one of you thinks an unreviewed candidate would be useful for
> further analysis, please let me know.
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-03 17:02 Chris Bainbridge
2026-10-04 13:39 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-10-04 15:09 ` Chris Bainbridge
2026-10-04 17:53 ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-10-06 10:55 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asTTo3AFzQoqZLoP@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=chris.bainbridge@canonical.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jasonmiu@google.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®