mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger@xenproject.org>
To: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: Fix IO race during unplug
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 16:14:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <asUCYtIJkFchdbNH@Mac.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006135807.2571779-1-ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>

On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 02:58:06PM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> During unplug, blkfront stops the hw queues and marks the disk as dead,
> then later during removal calls del_gendisk(). However, IO issued after
> the hw queues are stopped but before the call to del_gendisk() will be
> queued but never handled. This causes del_gendisk() to hang forever
> waiting for the queue refcount to drop to zero.
> 
> This can be reproduced by issuing IO during an artificial delay after
> stopping the hw queues.

So the window is between the blk_mq_stop_hw_queues() and
blk_mark_disk_dead() calls where requests would be queued and never
processed?

> Fix this by simply not stopping the hw queues directly. Marking the disk
> as dead also freezes the queue which prevents new requests being added
> and it synchronously runs the hw queues to clear anything pending.

I think this likely needs expanding a bit: the disk is already marked
as dead with the current logic, and in the same place in the code.

> Fixes: 8e141f9eb803 ("block: drain file system I/O on del_gendisk")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>
> ---
> 
> I'm not sure about the Fixes tag. It's the most likely looking candidate
> to me but I didn't confirm whether it actually introduced the
> regression.

I was wondering the same, and even then someone might argue this was a
latent bug in blkfront itself, and the reference commit just exposed
it.  I don't have a strong opinion.

> 
>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> index 8dad7bf5f664..69a2315a1b20 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -2138,10 +2138,8 @@ static void blkfront_closing(struct blkfront_info *info)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* No more blkif_request(). */
> -	if (info->rq && info->gd) {
> -		blk_mq_stop_hw_queues(info->rq);
> +	if (info->gd)
>  		blk_mark_disk_dead(info->gd);

So blk_mark_disk_dead() behaves differently when called with the
queues still active?

Thanks, Roger.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-06 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-06 13:58 Ross Lagerwall
2026-10-06 14:14 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2026-10-06 14:43   ` Ross Lagerwall
2026-10-06 15:27     ` Roger Pau Monné

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=asUCYtIJkFchdbNH@Mac.lan \
    --to=roger@xenproject.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®