From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F94C44236A; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 14:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791296761; cv=none; b=OGtETccLLpnpho4qjccec/kMsBFtNrSurMZlRDYZTiGlHoUtMAQjOQnn9UtT9CcZMQ/oWSNlkCbiZpVgJqVFFV4k05d6ir8fM50k0Q1Zpp9+ZVWsocZ6J6es7WxgOSsDajnyzRbbdpMNvnwghb6tYkUWZqxVDkeA7K1HDlM2XEg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791296761; c=relaxed/simple; bh=58B1ddD0bDgLOMdhxF+WEswXvMTtPNEPKRJwaSKVgr4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GePu84raXpp3VcuiyZyDCTJ1biTGa2Jepd15bxTlFQ/wHvb0/z2xmoT2+qOlwhMIum910UUVzKOBGiGdwahBzpcSh2wQBGPhODPUb+Btvs/OdzrQEfONtFrkEF0NpeJ7LL4oFGSc9RFksAcpVsgZyYsCAiQogpO+LSqAzLCNaA0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mk1WWapT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mk1WWapT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FBAB1F000FF; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 14:25:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791296760; bh=HRZTZBQQkFbRudeH2578gmIh2EUFE7i5dzEQ4ykqzm0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=mk1WWapTTcf8AdgsrZSd9bgCycGtQRVvk/gryFdetHLHNHNzEXkU7YP9AwzQwWNqD XqvA2DQgeMuwzvy/aFxXXO0Hv0EUNcidXFaJ+hW+gMy1vorphigrWJ3OsEDSBvNXFg xOX9MgmaJ6Iqzy6zAzWYD3LTitOE9E7g01OElIYauLRClM3ly/Dn9/M0PzCHrf/srC 8VtCdnGvegYDoK1M0HrzbYYiiwado3xNX4YeEqXTc1RGzZOgKq2yX76ZXG2A/cFC+e zJf4n/8Jb1gjQ57txziC3AiEc/RdbmhPKEYNg5eGfBkf52Bz0g2RJlGwROedmPItkP q2MbwPRE+eUIw== Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 14:25:57 +0000 From: Tzung-Bi Shih To: Paul Louvel Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] watchdog: w83627hf_wdt: Report all initialization failures in probe Message-ID: References: <20261004-w83627hf_wdt-improvements-v3-0-8e27b518595e@bootlin.com> <20261004-w83627hf_wdt-improvements-v3-6-8e27b518595e@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261004-w83627hf_wdt-improvements-v3-6-8e27b518595e@bootlin.com> On Sun, Oct 04, 2026 at 02:12:54PM +0200, Paul Louvel wrote: > @@ -549,12 +549,12 @@ static int wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > if (ret) > - return ret; > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to set watchdog timeout\n"); > } > > ret = devm_watchdog_register_device(dev, wdd); > if (ret) > - return ret; > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register watchdog\n"); Could this patch be split and squashed into the earlier patches in the series?