From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Cc: "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Hyunwoo Kim" <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] vsock: treat TCP_CLOSING as once-established
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 12:15:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asi-oV3fF1erjxVs@sgarzare-redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005-vsock-connect-reset-closing-v4-1-15d41cfda3ed@rbox.co>
On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 02:26:22AM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>Handle the TCP_ESTABLISHED -> TCP_CLOSING transition on OP_RST, which can
>race with the connect loop. Immediately break and return 0 on
>ESTABLISHED/CLOSING. The return value of connect() should reflect what
>happened up to the point the connection was established or failed. Events
>that occur afterwards must not affect it. E.g. even if OP_RW has already
>set sk_err, connect() should still return 0, not ENOBUFS because of it.
>Adapt the inaccurate comment above signal_pending().
>
>Resetting a socket that is still present in connected_table can lead to
>memory corruption. The reporter noted lost transports for in-flight skbs,
>and I have reproduced crashes caused by re-insertion into connected_table.
>
> list_add double add: new=, prev=, next=.
> kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:35!
> Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
> Workqueue: vsock-loopback vsock_loopback_work
> RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid_or_report+0x11f/0x130
> Call Trace:
> vsock_insert_connected.cold+0xe/0x13
> virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x10e9/0x1460
> vsock_loopback_work+0x305/0x480
> process_one_work+0xe4c/0x1560
> worker_thread+0x4f1/0xd60
> kthread+0x36e/0x470
> ret_from_fork+0x47b/0x6b0
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>
>This fix is supplementary to commit 002541ef650b ("vsock: Ignore
>signal/timeout on connect() if already established"). Details under Link.
>
>Fixes: d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets")
>Reported-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
>Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/anzT1fREOSyHT99k@v4bel/
>Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
LGTM! Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index 9b71479a2b29..14fe24b05f9c 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -1834,23 +1834,22 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *addr,
> timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
> lock_sock(sk);
>
>- /* Connection established. Whatever happens to socket once we
>- * release it, that's not connect()'s concern. No need to go
>+ /* Connection was established. Whatever happens to socket once
>+ * we release it, that's not connect()'s concern. No need to go
> * into signal and timeout handling. Call it a day.
> *
> * Note that allowing to "reset" an already established socket
> * here is racy and insecure.
> */
>- if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
>- break;
>+ if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ||
>+ sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSING) {
>+ err = 0;
>+ goto out_wait;
>+ }
>
> /* If connection was _not_ established and a signal/timeout came
> * to be, we want the socket's state reset. User space may want
>- * to retry.
>- *
>- * sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED implies that socket is not on
>- * vsock_connected_table. We keep the binding and the transport
>- * assigned.
>+ * to retry, so we keep the binding and the transport assigned.
> */
> if (signal_pending(current) || timeout == 0) {
> err = timeout == 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT : sock_intr_errno(timeout);
>
>--
>2.56.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 0:26 [PATCH net v4] vsock: fix connect() races Michal Luczaj
2026-10-05 0:26 ` [PATCH net v4] vsock: treat TCP_CLOSING as once-established Michal Luczaj
2026-10-07 0:27 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-07 9:24 ` Michal Luczaj
2026-10-09 9:44 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-10-09 10:15 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asi-oV3fF1erjxVs@sgarzare-redhat \
--to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®