From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
To: Shawn Guo <shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: qcom: pas: Decide early_boot attach at probe time
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 16:20:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asj4Sgsjw5xNXNLb@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006033550.2726451-2-shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 11:35:49AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> For early_boot subsystems, probe unconditionally marks the rproc
> RPROC_DETACHED and qcom_pas_attach() discovers from SMP2P whether the
> bootloader actually started the remote. If it did not, attach sets the
> state back to RPROC_OFFLINE and fails, expecting the core to boot the
> firmware instead. The core does not do that: rproc_boot() treats the
> attach failure as fatal and the remote is never started.
>
> This is hit on Nord with firmware where XBL no longer brings ADSP out
> of reset. The remote never publishes its inbound SMP2P entries, so the
> very first state read fails (debug print below) and the ADSP stays down:
>
> qcom_q6v5_pas 4c00000.remoteproc: Failed to get fatal_irq state: -19
> remoteproc remoteproc0: can't attach to rproc adsp: -19
>
> The ready, stop-ack and sysmon shutdown-ack signals cannot change while
> Linux has not yet interacted with the remote, so there is no reason to
> defer the decision to attach time. Check them in probe and only mark
> the rproc RPROC_DETACHED when the remote is up and has not been asked
> to stop; otherwise leave it RPROC_OFFLINE so the regular firmware boot
> path is taken. The ready state is read first so that a missing SMP2P
> entry -ENODEV is treated as "not running" before sysmon is queried.
>
> qcom_pas_attach() keeps only the fatal check, since that is the one
> signal that has to be acted upon once the rproc is attached.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 64 +++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> index 2e1e39826ffa..8f3d45c604c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> @@ -550,9 +550,7 @@ static unsigned long qcom_pas_panic(struct rproc *rproc)
> static int qcom_pas_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct qcom_pas *pas = rproc->priv;
> - bool ready_state;
> bool crash_state;
> - bool stop_state;
> int ret;
>
> pas->q6v5.handover_issued = true;
> @@ -570,42 +568,46 @@ static int qcom_pas_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> goto disable_running;
> }
>
> - ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(pas->q6v5.stop_irq,
> - IRQCHIP_STATE_LINE_LEVEL, &stop_state);
> - if (ret)
> - goto disable_running;
> -
> - if (stop_state || qcom_sysmon_shutdown_irq_state(pas->sysmon)) {
> - dev_info(pas->dev, "Subsystem found stop state set. Falling back to start.\n");
> - goto unroll_attach;
> - }
> -
> - ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(pas->q6v5.ready_irq,
> - IRQCHIP_STATE_LINE_LEVEL, &ready_state);
> - if (ret)
> - goto disable_running;
> -
> - if (unlikely(!ready_state)) {
> - /*
> - * The bootloader may not support early boot, mark the state as
> - * RPROC_OFFLINE so that the PAS driver can load the firmware and
> - * start the remoteproc.
> - */
> - dev_err(pas->dev, "Failed to get subsystem ready interrupt\n");
> - goto unroll_attach;
> - }
> -
> return 0;
>
> -unroll_attach:
> - pas->rproc->state = RPROC_OFFLINE;
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> disable_running:
> pas->q6v5.running = false;
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * The bootloader may or may not have started the subsystem. Inspect the
> + * SMP2P state, which is static until Linux interacts with the remote, to
> + * decide whether to attach or to load and start the firmware.
> + */
> +static bool qcom_pas_is_running(struct qcom_pas *pas)
> +{
> + bool ready_state;
> + bool stop_state;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Check ready first: if the remote never published its SMP2P
> + * entries the state read fails with -ENODEV.
> + */
> + ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(pas->q6v5.ready_irq,
> + IRQCHIP_STATE_LINE_LEVEL, &ready_state);
> + if (ret || !ready_state) {
> + dev_info(pas->dev, "Subsystem not running. Falling back to start.\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(pas->q6v5.stop_irq,
> + IRQCHIP_STATE_LINE_LEVEL, &stop_state);
> + if (ret || stop_state || qcom_sysmon_shutdown_irq_state(pas->sysmon)) {
> + dev_info(pas->dev, "Subsystem found stop state set. Falling back to start.\n");
> + return false;
> + }
Nitpick: Both of these messages are a bit imprecise. desc->early_boot
does not necessarily imply desc->auto_boot, so they may just be marked
as offline and not automatically started.
But you just moved this code and I don't think it's worth resending just
to polish these messages a bit more. :-)
In any case:
Reviewed-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>
Thanks,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 3:35 [PATCH 0/2] remoteproc: qcom: pas: Fix early_boot attach for not running and crashed remotes Shawn Guo
2026-10-06 3:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: qcom: pas: Decide early_boot attach at probe time Shawn Guo
2026-10-09 14:20 ` Stephan Gerhold [this message]
2026-10-06 3:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: qcom: pas: Don't fail attach if the remote has crashed Shawn Guo
2026-10-09 14:38 ` Stephan Gerhold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asj4Sgsjw5xNXNLb@linaro.org \
--to=stephan.gerhold@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=jingyi.wang@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=shengchao.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®