From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Anderson Ferneda <anderson.ferneda@braza.com.br>,
Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ocfs2: use the stored hash when checking xattr bucket collision
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 23:05:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <askCqE-GKFv8tK1q@p15> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009083002.2621201-3-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 04:30:01PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> ocfs2_check_xattr_bucket_collision() decides whether splitting a full
> bucket can make room for the entry being set by recomputing the hash of
> the name:
>
> u32 name_hash = ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, name, strlen(name));
>
> if (name_hash != le32_to_cpu(xh->xh_entries[0].xe_name_hash))
> return 0;
>
> For a new entry that is the hash it will be stored under, so comparing it
> is correct. An existing entry keeps the hash it already has: an update
> never rewrites xe_name_hash, since ocfs2_xa_add_entry() is the only
> writer of that field for a real entry and ocfs2_xa_prepare_entry() calls
> it only when loc->xl_entry is NULL.
>
> An entry stored by a kernel that sign-extended the name bytes when
> hashing can still be updated, because ocfs2_xattr_find_entry() searches
> a non-indexed xattr block by memcmp on the name and never looks at
> xe_name_hash. Growing it past the space left in the block converts the
> block into a tree, ocfs2_cp_xattr_block_to_bucket() fills the bucket in
> stored hash order, and the update runs out of room in the bucket too.
> The collision check then compares the unsigned hash against the legacy
> hashes in the bucket and reports no collision.
>
> ocfs2_xattr_set_entry_index_block() goes on to allocate a bucket that
> ocfs2_divide_xattr_bucket() cannot fill: a bucket whose entries all share
> one hash has no divide position, so all it does is append an empty bucket
> with a sentinel hash one above the last entry's.
>
> The re-search that follows depends on where the unsigned hash sorts.
> Below the legacy ones, it comes back to the full bucket and the set fails
> with -ENOSPC, having grown the tree for nothing. Above them, it lands on
> the new empty bucket, which ocfs2_xattr_bucket_find() handles explicitly
> and ocfs2_find_xe_in_bucket() scans zero times, so the set stores a second
> copy of the entry under the unsigned hash and returns success. The
> original stays in the full bucket, listxattr reports the name twice and
> getxattr returns the new copy.
>
> Pass the hash the entry is stored under instead: the stored one for an
> existing entry, the unsigned one for a new entry. A tree whose entries
> are all stored under the unsigned hash sees no change, since there the
> two are the same value.
>
> Exposed-by: 3bc753c06dd0 ("kbuild: treat char as always unsigned")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.2+
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> index a428fe908116..c5a39a7d43d0 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> @@ -5896,16 +5896,14 @@ static int ocfs2_rm_xattr_cluster(struct inode *inode,
>
> /*
> * check whether the xattr bucket is filled up with the same hash value.
> - * If we want to insert the xattr with the same hash, return -ENOSPC.
> - * If we want to insert a xattr with different hash value, go ahead
> - * and ocfs2_divide_xattr_bucket will handle this.
> + * If the entry being set carries that same hash, return -ENOSPC, since
> + * ocfs2_divide_xattr_bucket() has no divide position to work with.
> + * Otherwise go ahead and ocfs2_divide_xattr_bucket() will handle this.
> */
> -static int ocfs2_check_xattr_bucket_collision(struct inode *inode,
> - struct ocfs2_xattr_bucket *bucket,
> - const char *name)
> +static int ocfs2_check_xattr_bucket_collision(struct ocfs2_xattr_bucket *bucket,
> + u32 name_hash)
> {
> struct ocfs2_xattr_header *xh = bucket_xh(bucket);
> - u32 name_hash = ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, name, strlen(name));
>
> if (name_hash != le32_to_cpu(xh->xh_entries[0].xe_name_hash))
> return 0;
> @@ -5974,6 +5972,7 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_set_entry_index_block(struct inode *inode,
> struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs,
> struct ocfs2_xattr_set_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> + u32 name_hash;
> int ret;
>
> trace_ocfs2_xattr_set_entry_index_block(xi->xi_name);
> @@ -5993,10 +5992,18 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_set_entry_index_block(struct inode *inode,
> * the maximum number of collisions we will allow for then is
> * one bucket's worth, so check it here whether we need to
> * add a new bucket for the insert.
> + *
> + * An existing entry keeps the hash it was stored under, and that is
> + * the hash a split has to work with. A new entry is stored under the
> + * unsigned one, which is what ocfs2_xa_add_entry() will write.
> */
> - ret = ocfs2_check_xattr_bucket_collision(inode,
> - xs->bucket,
> - xi->xi_name);
> + if (xs->not_found)
> + name_hash = ocfs2_xattr_name_hash(inode, xi->xi_name,
> + xi->xi_name_len);
> + else
> + name_hash = le32_to_cpu(xs->here->xe_name_hash);
> +
> + ret = ocfs2_check_xattr_bucket_collision(xs->bucket, name_hash);
> if (ret) {
> mlog_errno(ret);
> goto out;
> --
> 2.39.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 8:29 [PATCH v2 0/3] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed name hash values Joseph Qi
2026-10-09 8:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed dir index " Joseph Qi
2026-10-09 8:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ocfs2: use the stored hash when checking xattr bucket collision Joseph Qi
[not found] ` <sashiko-outbox-165102@kernel.org>
2026-10-09 9:36 ` Joseph Qi
2026-10-09 15:05 ` Heming Zhao [this message]
2026-10-09 15:08 ` Heming Zhao
2026-10-09 8:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ocfs2: deal with legacy signed xattr name hash values Joseph Qi
[not found] ` <sashiko-outbox-165103@kernel.org>
2026-10-09 9:41 ` Joseph Qi
2026-10-09 15:09 ` Heming Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=askCqE-GKFv8tK1q@p15 \
--to=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anderson.ferneda@braza.com.br \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®