mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	serge@hallyn.com, sergeh@kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@gmail.com,
	jjzuming@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] keys: Avoid the owner account dereference in named keyring lookup
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 23:50:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <asqlIhgBFnybHIBT@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pm-key-management-objects-candidate-0002-v3-2baa8cad2bb554364e10@gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 01:11:59PM +0800, Cen Zhang wrote:
> Named keyring lookup must keep the storage containing the owner UID
> alive through the namespace mapping check.  find_keyring_by_name()
> reads keyring->user->uid under keyring_name_lock, but that lock protects
> the keyring's name entry and allocation, not its separate key_user.
> 
> A named session-keyring join can overlap a privileged KEYCTL_CHOWN on
> another CPU.  If the keyring holds the last reference to its old dynamic
> key_user and the ownership transfer succeeds, the following ordering is
> possible:
> 
>     Named join                         Chown
>     find_keyring_by_name()              keyctl_chown_key()
>       read_lock(keyring_name_lock)       down_write(key->sem)
>       load old keyring->user
>                                          replace key->user and key->uid
>                                          up_write(key->sem)
>                                          key_put(key)
>                                          key_user_put(old user): free
>       read old user->uid
>       read_unlock(keyring_name_lock)
> 
> Chown neither takes keyring_name_lock nor key_session_mutex, so it can
> free the old account between the pointer load and the UID read.  The
> lookup then reads freed memory even though the keyring itself is alive.
> 
> Use keyring->uid for the mapping check.  key_alloc() initializes this
> inline owner UID and keyctl_chown_key() updates it on chown.
> The existing name lock keeps its containing keyring allocated throughout
> the check, so lookup no longer depends on the account's lifetime.  This
> also matches the owner UID used by the permission check.
> 
> KASAN report as below:
> 
>     BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in find_keyring_by_name+0x577/0x5d0
>     Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881128ae2ec by task keycase/500
> 
> Fixes: 2ea190d0a006 ("keys: skip keys from another user namespace")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Trim the KASAN report to its two-line fault summary.
> 
> Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/pm-key-management-objects-candidate-0002-v2-dd6c20a1d92928b33ab7@gmail.com
> 
> diff --git a/security/keys/keyring.c b/security/keys/keyring.c
> index 15bf4af8f28218ec3f12c97630d1c76939af7eca..46f774be72967a9bd16b0ddfdf323eda36edeff4 100644
> --- a/security/keys/keyring.c
> +++ b/security/keys/keyring.c
> @@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ struct key *find_keyring_by_name(const char *name, bool uid_keyring)
>  	 * grants Search permission and that hasn't been revoked
>  	 */
>  	list_for_each_entry(keyring, &ns->keyring_name_list, name_link) {
> -		if (!kuid_has_mapping(ns, keyring->user->uid))
> +		if (!kuid_has_mapping(ns, keyring->uid))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (test_bit(KEY_FLAG_REVOKED, &keyring->flags))

Thanks.


Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

Br, Jarkko

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-10 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09  5:11 Cen Zhang
2026-10-10 20:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=asqlIhgBFnybHIBT@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jjzuming@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=sergeh@kernel.org \
    --cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®