From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FA643603DF for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2026 21:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791667715; cv=none; b=uL0FKSJot8SMcw3zx8ucqfdg/iKmqJmR4fRlfVB33iXYVLEWpoRnOjztj/VCVqb+Ds0MAprpHW0TxhpM9Q0N7s4ngBTtUkZXuknFeUgsJ2dBK1zGDUqmAchdDKDHog/a8Q2mInW6jy46Tc28hBOt/3EOWTHhUEhaDSfUEf/X0Bg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791667715; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hZwCdPORanRj+tX/jGD1C4mZw3+SoChXKKT8L9EC4Gc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uC/9RcRp7VezPXqGFPd9EgMm2sXE7+2qhs7zUZh8WIM3cWPxLS0wvfnE82YwJm/mHOQL8G/Hhw+eIAGDNRQwn2BXRxO5tlQUE2+OIXXdjDuBNHQK1Z/1Ofh/WGikowedmiPsF12qOec4YXWc+rz8bBWSF6wGGlmoFCSFuu08KfQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AdsEZHUj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AdsEZHUj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FF0F1F000FF; Sat, 10 Oct 2026 21:28:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791667714; bh=A0mLpUjsNB+/hFJXiSI4UsRTSWL1TE0IwIRugJLK2mA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=AdsEZHUj5k2pfgQnJLsW5C0VAiUQ47NxbgmMYVyZkT4qSu8taeA+hpoe8Mzvc0hrE aJiQd7hSb/Icb+BboDTz+o5u4EuPajVA7vHyUxqwbrbmi2Dfb5uLOGjP4E+p2Cja5v b90Oal8FTO6sgXK04XLEIghnLWBHrXCy4nKRy6qsG0Z3Fi+OA1VZq/XEFT7NBxwFIt BMvrtp1cUiTYDkYBS+gbqCxkMQBR9I2khD0eUyTAcuwxiJjZA4EMduC5tvi3xh79N1 e00zvZnTxUPNxIoY3G6nFNdsIL/S/LoO2XA7+wqK4gnmwPjginQcme5c9woxEMPFZM 3r9PLQCTtKIjg== Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 23:28:26 +0200 From: Gao Xiang To: Chao Yu Cc: xiang@kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yue Hu , Jeffle Xu , Sandeep Dhavale , Hongbo Li , Chunhai Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: erofs: add dev branch to git tree entry Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Chao Yu , xiang@kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yue Hu , Jeffle Xu , Sandeep Dhavale , Hongbo Li , Chunhai Guo References: <20261010070623.1766952-1-chao@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261010070623.1766952-1-chao@kernel.org> On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 03:06:23PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > From: Chao Yu > > The EROFS entry lists the git tree without a branch, so tools that > derive a baseline from MAINTAINERS, e.g. sashiko, fall back to the > remote HEAD, which points to master. master only moves at -rc1, so > series developed against the dev branch fail to apply there. > > Name the dev branch explicitly, where erofs patches are queued. > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Acked-by: Gao Xiang Hi Chao, BTW, could we request sashiko folks adding erofs mailing list to their review list as well? Since some patch could not Cc LKML or fsdevel, but I guess we need them to be reviewed by sashiko too. Thanks, Gao Xiang