From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Richard Chang <richardycc@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] zram: use rw_semaphore for decompression streams
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 13:28:01 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <assQJStvoDK0nepk@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009071157.3730698-12-senozhatsky@chromium.org>
On (26/10/09 16:11), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Currently, per-CPU decompression streams use a mutex, so there is
> a chance for priority inversion - a low priority Reader can get
> preempted by a higher priority Reader, which simply will get
> blocked on the stream mutex.
>
> Switch zcomp_dstrm lock from mutex to rw_semaphore to permit parallel
> usage. However, things are not completely straightforward. Many
> backends have stateless decompression and don't modify decompression
> context, so those can be used concurrently. But then there are backends
> that do modify decompression context. We also can have compressed
> object span across physical pages, which zcomp linearises using stream's
> ->local_copy buffer before decompression. That buffer, clearly, cannot
> be used concurrently.
>
> When the backend has no per-stream decompression context (stateless)
> and zsmalloc object fits in a single page (ZCOMP_DECOMP_INPLACE), take
> the stream lock in shared mode (read). Otherwise, when ->local_copy
> is needed (ZCOMP_DECOMP_BOUNCE) or the backend has a decompression
> context (zstd, deflate), take the lock in exclusive mode (write).
>
> A quick synthetic fio test on 24 CPUs (preempt=full, lz4, 48 low
> priority (nice 19) readers, 24 normal priority (nice 0) CPU hogs
> and 24 high priority (nice -19) readers):
>
> Metric Base Patched
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Read IOPS 473k 680k (+43.8%)
> Read clat avg 35.98 us 21.28 us (-40.9%)
> Read clat p99.95 55.55 us 20.86 us (-2.7x)
> Read clat p99.99 6,717 us 2,834 us (-2.4x)
> Read clat max 2,005,100 us 1,614,300 us (-19.5%)
>
> Suggested-by: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
JFI
I have completely reworked this patch. Will run tests and then
send out v3.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 7:11 [PATCH v2 00/11] zram: redesign zcomp and rework backends Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] zram: prefix backends printk-s Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] zram: remove debugfs entry on init failure Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] zram: zstd: do not allocate empty C/D-dictionaries Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] zram: lz4hc: pre-initialize dictionary stream in setup_params Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] zram: lz4: use LZ4_decompress_safe_usingDict() Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] zram: lz4hc: " Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] zram: zstd: do not use kvzalloc() for zstd allocations Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] zram: reset writeback state in zram_reset_device() Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] zram: split zcomp into separate R/W streams Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] zram: use a singleton compression context for recompression Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] zram: use rw_semaphore for decompression streams Sergey Senozhatsky
2026-10-11 4:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=assQJStvoDK0nepk@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=richardycc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®