mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>
To: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	ntfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ntfs: enforce the encrypted-file policy on the read paths
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 19:01:01 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <asyv3dcrnMUlisTp@hyunchul-PC02> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012062040.3826828-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>

This whole series look good to me.

Reviewed-by: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 02:20:38PM +0800, Zhan Xusheng wrote:
> From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
> 
> EFS-encrypted attributes are refused with -EOPNOTSUPP in exactly one
> place, ntfs_read_folio(), because decryption is not implemented.  Two
> read paths get there without passing that test and return the raw
> on-disk ciphertext instead, so the same read returns either ciphertext
> or -EOPNOTSUPP depending on which path serves it.
> 
> Patch 1 is readahead, which marks the folios uptodate so ->read_folio
> is never called.  read(), mmap(), splice() and fadvise() all populate
> the page cache this way, so one test closes all four.
> 
> Patch 2 is direct I/O, which bypasses the page cache entirely and has
> no such backstop.
> 
> Both commits are in v7.1.  I have not added Cc: stable; returning
> ciphertext rather than an error is a correctness bug but not a
> privilege boundary crossing, so that call is better made by the
> maintainers.
> 
> Found by reading the code.  I have no EFS-encrypted NTFS volume, so
> there is no reproducer; the paths were traced in the source.
> 
> Zhan Xusheng (2):
>   ntfs: do not read ahead encrypted files
>   ntfs: reject direct I/O reads of encrypted files
> 
>  fs/ntfs/aops.c | 7 ++++---
>  fs/ntfs/file.c | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> base-commit: d6d3455d8751854e0d1820f14184682e23ac4475
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Hyunchul

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12  6:20 Zhan Xusheng
2026-10-12  6:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] ntfs: do not read ahead encrypted files Zhan Xusheng
2026-10-12  8:49   ` liubaolin
2026-10-12  6:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] ntfs: reject direct I/O reads of " Zhan Xusheng
2026-10-12  8:49   ` liubaolin
2026-10-12  8:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] ntfs: enforce the encrypted-file policy on the read paths liubaolin
2026-10-12 10:01 ` Hyunchul Lee [this message]
2026-10-12 11:58 ` Namjae Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=asyv3dcrnMUlisTp@hyunchul-PC02 \
    --to=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®