From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC39496D54 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.46 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791816571; cv=none; b=ClUU1wtwev3mEItK1aiQAoH8QMdWhM0tekXwL+ynHDUq9oCOK5xtfNLT4t5LOlT/waH3vg9YldJpJdDRLLLDCaM7uM1mHmbInuYBVrsbrBd3oVzlwVdxpXAOskgD4VKOVayeBH8yT0HOqgUB6Xiy+9eKRlZMDpztGu+KF+2G07E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791816571; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9zUPL5NVEOabXBETdoVcRvq0NcBLE5K5KiwUVsZ6rXg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nFHjAUwiHR6soyJNvCB9idYFR3LzN9YDgZHJaggqvwhl9f/qYji+eXAt9H5wZI2uWze4wZXxpZ7vHDy4cAuXlY4w43ARza/jEKbnJf58zA7IF6uMvGKSULXMS2oEMDX0v3kehMqUkoIn/nHi6x8PSm3XKW/LJv12yw+5CiDB6Tw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=EvuCl+4r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.46 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="EvuCl+4r" Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4a021c28046so57265e9.1 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:49:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1791816568; x=1792421368; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=8W07NsiEHCJwsJueJBy/t/T/wHddWfvjW0+P0EskkyI=; b=EvuCl+4r1DnyiP1qn0E8itX1MQp+z9Uhgh1RAsIANjhhqlW8N9JFhYKbTMVWNeZ7NR bHDlC5pzQgyCC0o/v0nMsVK0DcUPgpCIcMHsFJ0nbFs0V6/tbItb/T89ED41z6VWXdjS yNCJVjoWBSmr/9bM8gO88yLkHZY4MCbnUNamKp6llTr07EMBSDNwf+MxJVu1/dM1sXLn lOvgI9kUoQ0gr8MfC9PRYnvk18SsZ+Qylonzk0frtRn6AnEjEF9ngfULPiergMePvT5T nxF4sBi3KrCVXGMK6zsS104dm7pW0tVJow3HU/gGQYAajilrNwE7yCfOIBtUvI3cgetc n63g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1791816568; x=1792421368; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=8W07NsiEHCJwsJueJBy/t/T/wHddWfvjW0+P0EskkyI=; b=ZotjkRFFoffSVi3g9r7yihCKSWVRzzPwA9JaN/1CMtIq/T9D8k0H+aulmo1XC3U5aY 4E3hCDUELG7HdfSazzhF5csakBE/FtqqRNulBxUGTx/2kV5gcNZGm/PZjEDVr515HXe4 fY7ITdZxv8Lspc6hzDg0PfcW5RgrXoNOP85HROLrPEx7bfqtBe4KkETjHBu5cqiC6veK Erk8lZ7gNdJxxE7NdeR8/CFy8c+MWIVmYTii8cMXRfX7JudNbxaL467fba0Ha5DQE+IC SrX1/LnGpuiGacleSjH9BLVuTXOyxflghM8WCP7zngy9b0W6wETBd3BkJMXgtui02Qfa kFjg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBwZLIWGhRWJKtpUMOIz89h4ibIPiOQSOdbqxdj4sHPJqyzTxH2DArEEbmAZSGZ7GrqSCmpdRsPtP21Q/rg=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYKIp0FpaEt+WSrkfJaCV72hv4prSWvJmhsB1gpWlw2rWUbISB6h UOxgJ1vtBY2Tl0tlGMynlOiKQQW93NAaU45fSdVVo8gh9jaLSsnQkB+U5EjLPIwmaw== X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou35ONKpAQ8TCVWK3aYL196LIaWwX02YV66lNspTcij6FXW8iofERAZKcWAhZTA n53HOeJp2NU9Y39i+Yx4aQ7P9JE43jPlnoQoMV51527aezQD0MYp/S8QKoMHDIf63vTA3BssfFW pMoi6BFOztTf4cS/cLIk3xFXpfd9f0I78GVq5FYAwz7v3JeX1MrCGRanEsV83alwhA4c3QQQIcn tUAOdrtQZny4YFMrrC6YFAXPp8aa/vcVIzUx8U1Q8QZNNblqPtK6+m2Ixn1CVSf+t5TiW7QFUyO vJb4rOmaqs9DFokyQhLnBsQFsU7zxcEBPR0G6KFMZLeazgeDxkBaSyMGDNJmFYKnvWzX/S8iccA yKWQ67vseTEP482UMesdBr4I6t7EwYvzYvc5DkDTsmAhr0n3LZWZT9SPzViS6Vd+kIxOSpikfVV Rjr88K76NpIFD0FqpAN2wqjeZYaD+UrqLoRSYWnXNg3Va72yMxA+h/aXqoIeQBo/w3AG1Sowspb Wl29OPWMyXkezN5DK0+pc8mMycveXgXNQFCbjNxi4dqf9fXtVQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:8b54:b0:49e:b733:7277 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4a19d710a67mr1241395e9.2.1791816567153; Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:49:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (250.192.189.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.189.192.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4a19f249692sm172738315e9.3.2026.10.12.07.49.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Oct 2026 07:49:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 14:49:22 +0000 From: Mostafa Saleh To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Cc: Luigi Rizzo , Luigi Rizzo , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , Jonathan Corbet , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Ilias Apalodimas , Willem de Bruijn , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Joshua Washington , Harshitha Ramamurthy , Saeed Mahameed , Tariq Toukan , Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Alexander Lobakin , Michael Chan , Pavan Chebbi , iommu@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC: DMA_PMD 00/22] DMA_PMD: PMD_SIZE-backed IO buffer pools Message-ID: References: <20261003212241.3432303-1-lrizzo@google.com> <0cc1cac1-a500-489b-9c1b-b49598b5550b@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0cc1cac1-a500-489b-9c1b-b49598b5550b@kernel.org> On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 03:51:39PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > On 10/3/26 23:22, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > Here is a subsystem called DMA_PMD on which I would like feedback on > > architecture, possible enhancements, or kernel components that could be > > reused to avoid duplication. > > Here is a feedback to a subsystem called DMA_PMD ;) > > Why is basing this on PMDs (and embedding it in the name) the right approach? > > On architctures with large PMDs (512 MiB on arm64 with 64k), would we really > want to use 512 MiB pages, or rather something smaller (e.g., 2 MiB) that might > possibly also have TLB benefits (cont-pte)? +1 I raised the same point in the LPC talk. AFAIK, this series tries to solve both IOTLB pressure and CoCo bouncing at the same time which might be too strict; as for CoCo there is no actual IOMMU, so there is no sizing constraint. Also to reduce bouncing, I think it is sufficient to use the SWIOTLB instead of having a new pool + recycling, the tricky part is how to abstract that to client drivers as this would be needed beyond SKB. Thanks, Mostafa > > -- > Cheers, > > David >