From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Rongzheng Wang <testwrzwrz@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] xsk: defer software checksum until the skb is complete
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:15:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <at82NLzM7g8HGgum@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261024141157.59301-2-testwrzwrz@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 10:11:56PM +0800, Rongzheng Wang wrote:
> When XDP_UMEM_TX_SW_CSUM is used with multi-buffer TX, xsk_skb_metadata()
> calls skb_checksum_help() while only the first descriptor has been added to
> the skb. The checksum therefore covers just the first fragment, and
> skb_checksum_help() sets ip_summed to CHECKSUM_NONE, so the remaining
> fragments are never included in the checksum.
>
> Move the software checksum calculation to the point where the last
> descriptor has been added to the skb.
>
> On a checksum failure the packet is now dropped instead of being returned
> to the application for a retry. This path is not reachable with the
> existing metadata validation, but the behavior change is intentional.
>
> Fixes: 11614723af26 ("xsk: Add option to calculate TX checksum in SW")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rongzheng Wang <testwrzwrz@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/xdp/xsk.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> index 33475b180ea6..65be2a368325 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> @@ -1011,14 +1011,6 @@ static int xsk_skb_metadata(struct sk_buff *skb, void *buffer,
> skb->csum_start = hr + csum_start;
> skb->csum_offset = csum_offset;
> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
> -
> - if (unlikely(pool->tx_sw_csum)) {
> - int err;
> -
> - err = skb_checksum_help(skb);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> - }
> }
>
> if (flags & XDP_TXMD_FLAGS_LAUNCH_TIME)
> @@ -1030,6 +1022,14 @@ static int xsk_skb_metadata(struct sk_buff *skb, void *buffer,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int xsk_skb_sw_csum(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
> +{
> + if (!pool->tx_sw_csum || skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)
If i am reading this right check against ip_summed is a way to tell that
first frag had XDP_TXMD_FLAGS_CHECKSUM flag set.
Agreed with Jason to preserve unlikely() when checking pool->tx_sw_csum.
Regarding skb drop, I am leaning towards this, I don't see much sense in
retry when packet is malformed? Not sure how this could be communicated up
to user space.
> + return 0;
> +
> + return skb_checksum_help(skb);
> +}
> +
> static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(struct xdp_sock *xs,
> struct xdp_desc *desc)
> {
> @@ -1275,6 +1275,12 @@ static int __xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk)
> if (xp_mb_desc(&desc)) {
> xs->skb = skb;
> continue;
> + } else {
> + err = xsk_skb_sw_csum(skb, xs->pool);
> + if (unlikely(err)) {
> + xsk_drop_skb(skb);
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> err = __dev_direct_xmit(skb, xs->queue_id);
> --
> 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 9:12 [PATCH net] " Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-24 9:15 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-24 11:35 ` 王荣峥
2026-10-24 12:25 ` Jason Xing
2026-10-24 14:11 ` [PATCH net v2 0/2] xsk: fix multi-buffer TX software checksum Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-24 14:11 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] xsk: defer software checksum until the skb is complete Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-25 2:51 ` Jason Xing
2026-10-25 3:43 ` Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-26 11:15 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-10-26 12:34 ` Magnus Karlsson
2026-10-26 14:27 ` Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-26 14:31 ` Magnus Karlsson
2026-10-24 14:11 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: cover AF_XDP multi-buffer TX software checksum Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-25 14:46 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-26 14:55 ` Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-24 14:15 ` [PATCH net v2 0/2] xsk: fix " netdev-bot+sinfo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=at82NLzM7g8HGgum@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=testwrzwrz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®