From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Christian Aurich Zanettini Martins <christian.aurichzm@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de,
sagi@grimberg.me, sgogte@purestorage.com, mgurtovoy@nvidia.com,
israelr@nvidia.com, wagi@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-rdma: fix NULL metadata_sgl dereference with T10-PI
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 09:58:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <at94ipr6nhBIMBK2@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261024213737.506824-1-christian.aurichzm@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 06:37:37PM -0300, Christian Aurich Zanettini Martins wrote:
> Since commit 2a8513091d2f ("nvme-rdma: parallelize I/O queue allocation
> and startup") the I/O tag set is allocated before the I/O queues.
> nvme_rdma_init_request() only sets req->metadata_sgl if
> queue->pi_support is set, but pi_support is only set later by
> nvme_rdma_alloc_queue(), so every I/O request is left with a NULL
> metadata_sgl.
>
> With an RDMA device that supports integrity and a namespace formatted
> with protection information, nvme_rdma_dma_map_req() then dereferences
> the NULL pointer on the first integrity I/O, already during the
> namespace scan when there is more than one I/O queue.
>
> Queues that a later reconnect adds for the first time have the same
> problem.
>
> Check queue_idx and the controller's max_integrity_segments instead,
> which is what nvme_rdma_alloc_queue() derives pi_support from.
Thanks, applied to nvme-7.4.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 21:37 Christian Aurich Zanettini Martins
2026-10-26 15:58 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=at94ipr6nhBIMBK2@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=christian.aurichzm@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=israelr@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sgogte@purestorage.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wagi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®