From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+8922e6b8343f70be92e8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] workqueue: mark pool->nr_running as __data_racy
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 01:05:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atCJKit7SNhI87fV@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014154342.20661-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 10:43:41PM +0700, Nguyen Ngoc Thang wrote:
> wq_worker_running() increments pool->nr_running with only preemption
> disabled, while kick_pool_pick() reads it via need_more_worker() under
> pool->lock, so the two can run concurrently on different CPUs. KCSAN
> reports:
>
> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in kick_pool_pick / wq_worker_running
>
> write to 0xffff888059c2af24 of 4 bytes by task 3007 on cpu 0:
> wq_worker_running+0x114/0x130
> schedule_timeout+0x16e/0x180
> io_schedule_timeout+0x4c/0x70
> submit_bio_wait+0xd7/0x110
> blkdev_issue_flush+0x4c/0x70
> ext4_sync_file+0x60d/0x6c0
> aio_fsync_work+0x7f/0x270
> process_one_work+0x4ae/0xa00
>
> read to 0xffff888059c2af24 of 4 bytes by task 3001 on cpu 1:
> kick_pool_pick+0x7a/0x3a0
> __queue_work+0x72d/0xcf0
> queue_work_on+0x9d/0xb0
> schedule_on_each_cpu+0x11a/0x2d0
> vmstat_refresh+0x23/0x140
> proc_sys_call_handler+0x2b9/0x4f0
>
> The race is benign. The increment in wq_worker_running() is the only
> lockless write to nr_running; decrements and the reset are done under
> pool->lock, so a reader holding the lock sees either the old or the new
> count. A stale 0 costs at most a spurious wakeup of an idle worker. A
> nonzero count is correct because the incrementing worker is running and
> re-checks the worklist under pool->lock before it stops counting. The
> increment can also go 1 -> 2, e.g. when a worker sleeping in a work item
> wakes up after kick_pool() woke another worker.
>
> The lockless increment is part of how nr_running is designed to work,
> as the comment above the field documents. Mark the field __data_racy
> so that every reader is covered, not just need_more_worker().
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+8922e6b8343f70be92e8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8922e6b8343f70be92e8
> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 15:43 Nguyen Ngoc Thang
2026-10-14 17:17 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-15 8:05 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atCJKit7SNhI87fV@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+8922e6b8343f70be92e8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®