From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1762254145D for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792081176; cv=none; b=VDglWyzfLxV1omkzfsdc2OLFRINoPnDzL0FSAFH8rEokgvlME+Ktlx83annoLZvRsnzR1ZmdzIBENCFfNIlFoj+wEJf5mMbeR6pYAOA+u/+rJKnFZcNXdr2R0CPeyaul8287+MzY1/JoP3lhEAvpSo/cXlwumEH8a6rAc5i/KZM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792081176; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xMAM9hV9q3usLGa0cayv5iFXkC8RuZj89hXuc95wOgk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KSn3PDy96i98L4Lt/6UdXXrD9lk1qlAiGJVi+TMRkvwIH3fdSnCyKM8Hd43Tkq84kCu/UPWgSeMuml4EaKyVDPNqtVCaUw/wS5N4S7ki+jTwSDuY2n3y3hM80XTBdyjC+aq7Uv2U/Tv2sdnqT98scBSKENYaN/gQxRF4C5cc9z4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OtIyLrwC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OtIyLrwC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7A711F000C4; Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:19:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792081164; bh=HYFG290IcaoYwXzOqV8ubmLb8a7PUjjAS/yMSxm5KfM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=OtIyLrwC7o10uo3W+nu328B4YSiNFkoMjs4gUZylrVfl8th8PiYT67NASOGrrNUe3 Y/h6vaObnRMZvvDwW6S+VwLrSrPZi9y74Yt++MEYnObU/er6Rw2j8kns8x3iM5iVVi w1lqJBr/4onje4eozJoHNWNLeZfiAdcogoKAaNYYXvQ6QAOtTT/vPxb4amznD5QBjt tX9eRGZJaVGaOSJKr+YR8vaR2mhzPKwRYvZMsiJiINki0vLFnpS1/8WLiA1ptXuVa6 PwXvPoYc/JtNZziESoVNV2YOjNuLSkYmK58lfkHUGXIOcNXN8BWZpDXXrte/n5Kjce GD5Yq41nL1LlQ== Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:19:22 +0000 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Nanzhe Zhao Cc: Nanzhe Zhao , Barry Song , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Juan Yescas , Daeho Jeong , Pengfei Li , Dev Jain , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand , Bo Zhang , Kalesh Singh , Ryan Roberts , Nanzhe Zhao Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v5 00/16] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Message-ID: References: <20261014064445.2835813-1-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com> <63e416aa.2fb2.1a13d9f3491.Coremail.nzzhao@126.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63e416aa.2fb2.1a13d9f3491.Coremail.nzzhao@126.com> On 10/15, Nanzhe Zhao wrote: > > Hi Jaeguk: > > >Ok, this comes when applying "f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO". > > > > So we didn't reproduce this bug with the whole series patched on dev-test? I hit this after applying the entire patch set. Then, tried to bisect and got an issue with that patch in the first round. > > Thanks, > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel