From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: founder@crepuse.com
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, krzk@kernel.org,
ulfh@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
huibin.hong@rock-chips.com, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dmaengine: pl330: Fix unbalanced runtime PM
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:25:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atIz5ZsJNUZ1ocE7@SMW015318> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015-review-pl330-pm-original-v3-v3-1-5be09f37df77@crepuse.com>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 07:58:08AM +0800, Mizuno Miotsuki via B4 Relay wrote:
> [You don't often get email from devnull+founder.crepuse.com@kernel.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> From: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>
>
> This driver use runtime PM autosuspend mechanism to manager clk.
>
> pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&adev->dev);
> pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&adev->dev, PL330_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY);
>
> So, after ref count reached to zero, it will enter suspend
> after the delay time elapsed.
>
> The unbalanced PM:
>
> * May cause dmac the next start failed.
> * May cause dmac read unexpected state.
> * May cause dmac stall if power down happen at the middle of the transfer.
> e.g. may lose ack from AXI bus and stall.
>
> Considering the following situation:
>
> DMA TERMINATE TASKLET ROUTINE
> | |
> | issue_pending
> | |
> | pch->active = true
> | pm_runtime_get
> pm_runtime_put(if active) |
> pch->active = false |
> | work_list empty
> | |
> | pm_runtime_put(unconditional)
> | |
>
> At this point, it's unbalanced(1 get / 2 put).
>
> After this patch:
>
> DMA TERMINATE TASKLET ROUTINE
> | |
> | issue_pending
> | |
> | pch->active = true
> | pm_runtime_get
> pm_runtime_put(if active) |
> pch->active = false |
> | work_list empty
> | |
> | pm_runtime_put(if active)
> | |
But if without lock, sequency May
| pch->active = true
| pm_runtime_get
| |
|
| work_list empty
| |
| pm_runtime_put(if active)
| |
pm_runtime_put(if active)
pch->active = false
so put will call twice.
Without resolve thread DMA TERMINATE and TASKLET ROUTINE's sync problem,
it is hard to fix it.
Frank
>
> Now, it's balanced(1 get / 1 put).
>
> Fixes: 5c9e6c2b2ba3 ("dmaengine: pl330: Fix runtime PM support for terminated transfers")
> Fixes: ae43b3289186 ("ARM: 8202/1: dmaengine: pl330: Add runtime Power Management support v12")
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1650450456-34351-1-git-send-email-sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com
> Signed-off-by: Huibin Hong <huibin.hong@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mizuno Miotsuki <founder@crepuse.com>
> ---
> Hi Vinod, Sugar and Huibin,
>
> I am forwarding Sugar's April 2022 v2 as v3, with the same one-line
> change, original authorship and original Signed-off-by chain. The
> original submission is linked in the commit message. I found no mainline
> merge or revert of this change; current dmaengine fixes, next and master
> still use the unconditional assignment.
>
> Our SaneBSP investigation on an RK3308B UNIHIKER M10 independently
> rediscovered the same accounting issue. The experimental G-only kernel
> logged:
>
> dma-pl330 ff2c0000.dma-controller: Runtime PM usage count underflow!
>
> The subsequent H kernel, which included this gate, did not report the
> warning during a four-rate 62.625 MiB qualification and a bounded serdev
> regression. H also contains other changes, and G/H were experimental
> kernels. This is additional runtime evidence, not an isolated hardware
> proof of this one-line fix on upstream. None of the experimental cyclic
> DMA modifications is included here.
>
> A source-anchored reference-count model reproduces the extra put after
> termination in the old path and balances the active-gated path, including
> cyclic requeue. That is a model, not a compiled-kernel race reproducer.
>
> Validation of this rebased patch:
> - ARM64 W=1 drivers/dma/pl330.o build on dmaengine/fixes.
> - Strict checkpatch, including the two historical Fixes IDs.
> - Clean application on current dmaengine fixes/next/master and mainline.
>
> Would you reconsider the outstanding patch? Please let us know if there
> was an objection or an alternative fix outside the archived discussion.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Rebase the unchanged code change onto dmaengine/fixes, Linux 7.3-rc4.
> - Add an archival Link to the original v2.
> - Preserve the original author, commit explanation, Fixes and DCO trailers.
> - Add the bounded new evidence and validation here, outside the commit.
>
> Changes in v2 (Sugar, 2022):
> - Update the commit message following Vinod's suggestions.
>
> Regards,
> Mizuno Miotsuki
> ---
> drivers/dma/pl330.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
> index 6214d9000..17264a05d 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c
> @@ -2090,7 +2090,7 @@ static void pl330_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> spin_lock(&pch->thread->dmac->lock);
> _stop(pch->thread);
> spin_unlock(&pch->thread->dmac->lock);
> - power_down = true;
> + power_down = pch->active;
> pch->active = false;
> } else {
> /* Make sure the PL330 Channel thread is active */
>
> ---
> base-commit: 93f51579e7df248780214094418f205253383cc5
> change-id: 20261015-review-pl330-pm-original-v3-be881d29c3bf
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mizuno Miotsuki <founder@crepuse.com>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 10:27 [PATCH v2] " Sugar Zhang
2026-10-14 23:58 ` [PATCH v3] " Mizuno Miotsuki via B4 Relay
2026-10-15 16:51 ` Frank Li
2026-10-16 10:49 ` Mizuno Miotsuki
2026-10-16 14:25 ` Frank Li [this message]
2026-10-16 23:39 ` Mizuno Miotsuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atIz5ZsJNUZ1ocE7@SMW015318 \
--to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=founder@crepuse.com \
--cc=huibin.hong@rock-chips.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®