From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5B5D48F828; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792395573; cv=none; b=o3GDDLoUi/GaqYCWlEzIWxm02okJv9qH0zl3fs5kIuuR+4aiBzOjB/vBibc5gKpnbSxTHyncQkeApaLZwKp3xpLwDeFeMAN+dK5gAVdeyKYawKp+jc1x9Axohc5Qeb1SBeY1QWLEIdow0RHE+L4UU7fwevxr5JaQ5c8J2otlaG4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792395573; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1OyCKhRLaKm27vMEaGkvpx3V2Q+EAjnGyMadxo1SJDg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Z7jDh7AgsLHebcNfveW45DYSR51JZtT7TpWzTXCiLG/s4vsrP4S6uSQVTa954JUQuIgHevBA+ZigM7VvrbxhqTYEo+NaBgr9hARxIATdGdOeFTNJcQZteEQxaQvo8oco+jGW/GkABF5xia3kp8LD3xoahR7LFnzGs0wvcK8Yc20= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=LLuQEYGc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="LLuQEYGc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1792395572; x=1823931572; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1OyCKhRLaKm27vMEaGkvpx3V2Q+EAjnGyMadxo1SJDg=; b=LLuQEYGciOgdoLYcpGy6I3FmgYy2V8q/GCdhxpMEOcjzMyM0UdrL8eax Nd5ZofHrjkS6BP3WLpxijfiAIC/jXz/ynRiSqKCR2ViacYcqVcc3EqbZe lzZAyCFQIbls1ScBdc7jDdrKF3Eevk74x4WFZxmRsUXZsEVNynNHzOZFw J7g/jltiPGOupBnLMPfYZal2PbW1zy86WO/awVReLUhh6OpZ3tJkfN0Rw xEAIRHI53kwk6E06BF1GQXacXYDV9dHZNILogUNdmMWqOZEvsE7yVT7/D BQWQYb2SWsAI5Ac+OB5CRTDuIBTarcFKMSo3WYhSZby49iLJ8C8/ze1Cm A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +dWrr1ZAQBu7j2XbJtRqLA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: viDckE5qRAusHlFd229RTg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11939"; a="1084959" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,167,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="1084959" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Oct 2026 00:39:31 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: G9NiRom0Tg6Crkp6+qS3LQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MLeb7jQhQ0Ckdr/tgVvEig== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,167,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="2466994" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.209]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Oct 2026 00:39:29 -0700 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:39:26 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Nikodem Sanecki Cc: Mario Limonciello , Mark Pearson , Abduvaliy Abdulazizov , Dmitry Torokhov , Mika Westerberg , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ThinkPad L13 Gen 2 AMD (21AB): Caps Lock LED broken by ACPI GPIO 11 interrupt conflict Message-ID: References: <51c151fd-31cb-4ebe-8f3b-eb7634e68c31@amd.com> <4ba482fe-8b34-48ad-9d13-99ab532cbd97@app.fastmail.com> <8a94b2bd-70ae-405e-ab01-2a0d37dcc551@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 07:33:49PM +0100, Nikodem Sanecki wrote: > I've tested your patch on my ThinkPad L13 Gen 2 AMD. The Caps Lock LED > works without the kernel parameter, including after cold boots and > suspend/resume. All other hardware I've tested works normally, with no > regressions observed. > > Tested-by: Nikodem Sanecki nikodemsanecki@gmail.com Wrong thread. Please reply with the same there. > Thanks for the fix! Thanks for testing, but please stop top-posting! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko