From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com (mail-pl1-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6EAD497B85 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792398520; cv=none; b=SEihbDuilF94103mSNuUcPOFBuD8pL3Gxqs3QvA1RvP9gfl2fnKPBIDHYYrDh0FJB9/2jBF1Zb3YkudGFC946ANMXET4O6ttAQM0anNIU8cswvExFF9BKAAa4YckqEDI2bHtgJurOQ1MsUFmEtHftl6qI6DjWMPrgKw+1rL5inY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792398520; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7DGY4PHn22mBzSP+68tHwAmdJNJRgkdOyySSFzFXVIM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZQFOXUl9xoBCRiiRyvZ+pyUUt6aVwrbn7mOl9c/70aR1eYB+NWSAwfe6Me/waOCGu2a0WjOtCVwa2frtYSHK0H2tAe8D/PZXwyLKP7maeRk0Vzh7x/SdyUQppIKmkZJMIFtHzrkiXXc/0vHUhCrsATVvU3pG/1raUO7yy4tRK48= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=X4ChioHE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="X4ChioHE" Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2e8623790f8so67995ad.0 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 01:28:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1792398518; x=1793003318; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=QNi/4g2rcbVBYZWdEY3YYi0+ZnogZXZN5660dVgk0m4=; b=X4ChioHEkuFWiRKCzceJoKnXlXtSRBMVJgbXapzum+Q7tMu50hO3ObhMyNZlLFqdgy 6r3CwXpGWOhNTkwxk45nZUpiW1Z/a8PMbTgYad8Lv0K1AnlC/p2s3EcQ2JFkbsD1cbZ9 ONJXhyPa1VegjNyT7XWcAYWV4K89V1kDha8nOYQwo3KnrkLvmqY5jCztjGD2PPIjkKg5 jsQ4TXZTjuOV2SemTR2V+M19wPt2Flz/2ZRlgcL2FXgPQYpuQVxkPiO7RUCRPrpzLYhl U4hpk4SPfm97oEf8iktn23g12w9nDJlUeU60A8c72+0oeVu7ROE+1+PaYbOpoDjL6QMp nAKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792398518; x=1793003318; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=QNi/4g2rcbVBYZWdEY3YYi0+ZnogZXZN5660dVgk0m4=; b=QrzPcJA8eVGsGWjnapA07Ccu4ijlNSk3KsgQ5g8OlSZNNX0noiuI3dxFWR5Oa1ClSa +aon1i/U4xUg4zZSuOgN/dFWi8ENc9YH4dmqaNlJwIJfEE8ABBtFFB65KMB6iM2OAvD6 EPINg8glW4rXPDgjxgONTn6gvlmZTD6r4R1KcJoAlkPQ8K2ySwKHy6x31Ro1ZErNcj7l MMSBnIHTTuPD7yXyrmph2j+jrRqe9ziITEz1dbpLGR6I2YKHhcVsievQrpGnBn3ekzBh SIJTYrDuh42DFBxBTSQ0RQN7NPMw3pLdOLcxAhMXYH7vWMa/hVAJrERx/AvpLRrdTk8B 5r0A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBxWB9p3IxoFk9V4CTXSv64tANZ7NBz/xkQQK1u+o/CEWI92kRN2JqqtA8rIOIWORlYwbTvqOT1CO9Xd+UI=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYIt0par7fgTPE0QIQJeIsrWvJcr7/QQnZZLR2vLdI2z/Gc2EkEn PP7WuHGcMOn2vtKKhifT2h3+8Oh8QCS8iXyK9cB5K+TVdu2BpC4quTX148OV3M7MRvjCrGXQMjy /pkJvSUEL X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou0UfADPv0y5dwxUym8XYGpcECoSFCl5ZNp+e2v9qo0DKN3e3K5JnrNPfCJQm0I 5X8eezxakj3US0RUdeiBCsuQAqQ7J+9HKTSe5a8XJDNqaYYBmc7eYseren9oqNJGf/FMjd71Dle UxKxLNl/gGoX0KKrONn54pV39ZZVvsmSxDicyBc8EVXGAgyRlQxzkz5IBbBJ2VBJE737v6BGHva dz3BOqqHK6ufZGn8+FfjBAgMjIq7ZvDFX/KgOAN3cYFkuO8Guj2AZoOwZI4160N1HafDFhOKNS3 TGnpGBjYTEFKgvAEvQCgkgZ5wum24YWYbjydw6Dn8yt81klXjk6mqebTMCT92CYOsNWPV/PbthT /aDh/ZJK0qp8IUiGciRrqpdQ/vw062wdjpx7TFXrbJwY2esjJLedNB6wHA3mTXA70D3mBTpt90O 5CztjaGkUX/MSxEahbkEU+Sts0bD2N0+f7WCsskS/f1JQ0KWV/dn19iu90iDX0dXB6b/who37V4 MVt6/yewPTD9O7fa/mHlcP9cqDd56jekHrl X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1a10:b0:2df:8e89:3bff with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2e9b334381emr6523115ad.17.1792398517740; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 01:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (105.211.142.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.142.211.105]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-3acc4872861sm16015390a91.7.2026.10.19.01.28.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Oct 2026 01:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:28:29 +0000 From: Pranjal Shrivastava To: Robin Murphy Cc: Will Deacon , iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel , Jason Gunthorpe , Mostafa Saleh , Nicolin Chen , Daniel Mentz , Ashish Mhetre , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , Radu Rendec , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , rafael@kernel.org, Danilo Krummrich , driver-core@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 11/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add CMDQ_PROD_STOP_FLAG to gate CMDQ submissions Message-ID: References: <20260929034510.2023173-1-praan@google.com> <20260929034510.2023173-12-praan@google.com> <370a947c-601b-434c-befd-4896ed523ced@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <370a947c-601b-434c-befd-4896ed523ced@arm.com> On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 12:35:40PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 07/10/2026 3:08 pm, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 03:45:05AM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote: > > > Introduce a new bit flag, CMDQ_PROD_STOP_FLAG (bit 30), in the command > > > queue's producer index to safely gate command submissions during device > > > suspension. > > > > > > The flag embeds the suspend state directly into the existing global state > > > The flag is checked in the cmpxchg loop in arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(), > > > which acts as a Point of Commitment, ensuring that no indices are > > > reserved or committed once the SMMU begins suspending. > > > > I'm not familiar with the term "Point of Commitment". Is that something > > you came up with? Without a general definition, I think I'd prefer to > > avoid using it, especially as it sounds like something to do with the > > Arm memory system (where we already have architectural terms such as > > "Point of Coherency". > > > This prevents a situation of "abandoned batches" where indices are > > > incremented but commands are never written, which would otherwise > > > lead to timeout during the drain poll. > > > > > > Update queue_inc_prod_n() to preserve this flag during index > > > calculations, ensuring that any in-flight commands that successfully > > > passed the point of commitment can proceed to completion while the > > > flag remains set. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Daniel Mentz > > > Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen > > > Signed-off-by: Pranjal Shrivastava > > > --- > > > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++-- > > > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 5 +++ > > > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c > > > index a123810fac57..7f89e2306942 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c > > > @@ -218,7 +218,8 @@ static int queue_sync_prod_in(struct arm_smmu_queue *q) > > > static u32 queue_inc_prod_n(struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *q, int n) > > > { > > > u32 prod = Q_POS(q, q->prod) + n; > > > - return Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_POS(q, prod); > > > + > > > + return Q_OVF(q->prod) | Q_STOP(q->prod) | Q_POS(q, prod); > > > } > > > static void queue_poll_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > > > @@ -726,13 +727,42 @@ int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, > > > do { > > > u64 old; > > > + /* > > > + * If the SMMU is suspended/suspending, any new CMDs are elided. > > > + * This loop is the Point of Commitment. If we haven't cmpxchg'd > > > + * our new indices yet, we can safely bail. Once the indices are > > > + * committed, we MUST write valid commands to those slots to > > > + * avoid indefinite polling in the drain function. > > > + */ > > > + if (Q_STOP(llq.prod)) { > > > + local_irq_restore(flags); > > > + return 0; > > > + } > > > + > > > while (!queue_has_space(&llq, n + sync)) { > > > local_irq_restore(flags); > > > + > > > + /* Avoid waiting for space if the SMMU is suspending */ > > > + if (Q_STOP(READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.prod))) > > > + return 0; > > > + > > > if (arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(smmu, cmdq, &llq)) > > > dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMDQ timeout\n"); > > > > It's a bit grotty to have the extra READ_ONCE() here. Why not make > > arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full() return if the stop bit is set? > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h > > > index deefb17e31eb..794b258550dd 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h > > > @@ -394,6 +394,11 @@ static inline unsigned int arm_smmu_cdtab_l2_idx(unsigned int ssid) > > > #define CMDQ_ERR_CERROR_ATC_INV_IDX 3 > > > #define CMDQ_PROD_OWNED_FLAG Q_OVERFLOW_FLAG > > > +#define CMDQ_PROD_STOP_FLAG (1U << 30) > > > > I'm unsure about this. Bit 30 of the cmdq prod register is RES0, so it's > > plausible that the architecture allocates that bit for something in future. > > For example, if the index field was extended, then I think that would > > cause problems for the driver. > > > > Do we have to put the stop flag in the producer value, or can it just be > > a flag elsewhere in memory? > > Logically, it feels like this should happen earlier in the process anyway - > if we're entering a state where we don't want to accept _any_ new command > submissions, then surely arm_smmu_get_cmdq() should just start saying "No, > there is no valid queue to submit this command." to everything? > We can do that as well, but it can only be an early-out.. the STOP_FLAG may not be set when arm_smmu_get_cmdq() looks at it, but get set right after, before we reserve our slots in arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(). So we'd still need the check at the point where we actually commit, i.e. the cmpxchg on llq.prod. Thanks, Praan