From: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>
To: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
Cc: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, soc@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Ijae Kim" <ae878000@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: cznic: turris-omnia-mcu: stop button emulation producers
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 11:48:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atXYWrNAI5pmyMHD@solitude> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016013918.3492835-1-mhun512@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
This makes sense.
But I wonder whether the devm_delayed_work_drop() from devm-helpers.h
should not be changed to use disable_delayed_work_sync() instead of
cancel_delayed_work_sync().
In this case the initialization function in devm-helpers should be called
devm_delayed_work_autodisable() instead of devm_delayed_work_autocancel(),
though.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 09:39:18PM -0400, Myeonghun Pak wrote:
> The legacy MCU IRQ thread can requeue button-release emulation work
> after its managed cleanup has canceled it. Since the IRQ is still active
> at that point, the newly queued work can outlive device teardown and
> access freed MCU state.
>
> Use disable_delayed_work_sync() to prevent further queueing and drain
> the worker before the IRQ action is released. Keep the parent IRQ active
> while the worker completes. devm_add_action_or_reset() also drains the
> work if action registration fails.
>
> This issue was identified as part of our ongoing research while
> reviewing kernel code.
>
> Fixes: dfa556e45ae9 ("platform: cznic: turris-omnia-mcu: Add support for MCU connected GPIOs")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Co-developed-by: Ijae Kim <ae878000@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ijae Kim <ae878000@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Myeonghun Pak <mhun512@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../platform/cznic/turris-omnia-mcu-gpio.c | 31 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/cznic/turris-omnia-mcu-gpio.c b/drivers/platform/cznic/turris-omnia-mcu-gpio.c
> index 4e430d6c3fc4..8f43bfa92373 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/cznic/turris-omnia-mcu-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/cznic/turris-omnia-mcu-gpio.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
> #include <linux/bug.h>
> #include <linux/cleanup.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> -#include <linux/devm-helpers.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> @@ -841,6 +840,18 @@ static void button_release_emul_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> generic_handle_irq_safe(mcu->client->irq);
> }
>
> +static void omnia_disable_button_release_work(void *data)
> +{
> + struct delayed_work *work = data;
> +
> + /*
> + * The IRQ thread may requeue this work while the IRQ remains active.
> + * Disable and drain it before releasing the IRQ action and the MCU
> + * state used by the worker.
> + */
> + disable_delayed_work_sync(work);
> +}
> +
> static void
> fill_int_from_sts(unsigned long *rising, unsigned long *falling,
> unsigned long rising_sts, unsigned long falling_sts,
> @@ -1082,21 +1093,9 @@ int omnia_mcu_register_gpiochip(struct omnia_mcu *mcu)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Cannot request IRQ\n");
>
> if (!new_api) {
> - /*
> - * The button_release_emul_work has to be initialized before the
> - * thread is requested, and on driver remove it needs to be
> - * canceled before the thread is freed. Therefore we can't use
> - * devm_delayed_work_autocancel() directly, because the order
> - * devm_delayed_work_autocancel();
> - * devm_request_threaded_irq();
> - * would cause improper release order:
> - * free_irq();
> - * cancel_delayed_work_sync();
> - * Instead we first initialize the work above, and only now
> - * after IRQ is requested we add the work devm action.
> - */
> - err = devm_add_action(dev, devm_delayed_work_drop,
> - &mcu->button_release_emul_work);
> + err = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev,
> + omnia_disable_button_release_work,
> + &mcu->button_release_emul_work);
> if (err)
> return err;
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 1:39 Myeonghun Pak
2026-10-19 9:48 ` Marek Behún [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atXYWrNAI5pmyMHD@solitude \
--to=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=ae878000@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhun512@gmail.com \
--cc=soc@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®