From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 572534825C1; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792399914; cv=none; b=pdAM1VJO96z13PKYLGJ6U6uGnMRzN0FHmj2C6CXdHM6+4NtcLmo9j+6MFlYPqNTpT0/TIr6QlOe9OeYmBmenfsJ9L1W0yyep9VTLrf8yTuatDuxTzu8Unlvm6MZT/0vpgr+vhQ4/BygA7tpN49d79Cki/SOO96yG2nvDNzUBK6U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792399914; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dB75+XosuaesEMSkBOPHFQEz+haY5wzpgajQQdAYqXM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lnbKLMm+4vhMUqMwweGNgt+euqWXitQXcTjsl1XKqaYfwPQxgOoF0oZnuJ2DAFJzUMA5Bdw2yr6OmjW0Mol5stnP5NoxNj4J2NR7rRt0d6/lxdv5vDId0cOaJzi1YHWo+YItYf3y519UTIf45k/zKlzhE4ZYRONVvXjB5c0p3yg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=MjBH+2eN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="MjBH+2eN" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1792399913; x=1823935913; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=dB75+XosuaesEMSkBOPHFQEz+haY5wzpgajQQdAYqXM=; b=MjBH+2eNxeyGFQNTGI0sqNeC+swD2mZ1YuAKs8NnOxbDvYURYmXxpmO/ UtcVi0G6UyKson8869Nm6FqKCUHrzsvpwoORcMMhsGM1ntMjHgUZVfdaV gBuNWH9kyKi8urXn0a1ONxFTRUY7Y3o0cDA+CqVazv9lWPt/n66NqYguw artZanYFbLuZy57BQ2XIwiNqPRpD42sEcaExelWItpKnVi0KH9QE0CO5L TsOpJDj1LvZw/97Xt9PsavUl9dzkqG/hOfa/WV5lM+1MgQYdltobhucvf NXKbt2gQJSwoR4D4BmoypjkTN02UfaQfeXWscbs+LsYWNFO0qc/PGt6Un A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ln0DU+ptRV+LLwsi50ksxg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +uWbpCewS8avHPNkWI4HuQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11939"; a="957938" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,167,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="957938" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Oct 2026 01:51:53 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fRcld3oVRamN5fqSUbpIew== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 13NPNy1fSZG8yTCM4b4jbw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,167,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="2542725" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.209]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Oct 2026 01:51:50 -0700 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 11:51:48 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Joshua Crofts , Linus Walleij , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Dingisoul Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] iio: gyro: mpu3050: add missing trigger cleanup Message-ID: References: <20261017-mpu3050-fix-v3-0-d6f29f335a2b@gmail.com> <20261017192151.15986386@jic23-hlaptop> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261017192151.15986386@jic23-hlaptop> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Sat, Oct 17, 2026 at 07:21:51PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Sat, 17 Oct 2026 07:19:19 +0200 > Joshua Crofts wrote: > > > This series fixes an ignored error return value that causes the device > > to behave in a weird polling state and a subsequent use-after-free bug > > reported by Dingisoul. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Crofts > Not sure where signing off on cover letters came from. There is no need > as they don't form part of the permanent git record so DCO doesn't apply. It may. I often use `b4 shazam` for the series, and cover letter become a content of the merge-commit in such a case, so I'm fully for SoB of the cover letters. > Series looks fine to me but given others have been actively responding > to previous versions I'll leave it a while to pick up some tags. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko