From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org,
serge@hallyn.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@gmail.com,
jjzuming@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] keys: Protect the read method check against type removal
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 18:17:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atY0fRZ_s5UQk8Fk@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pm-key-management-objects-candidate-0010-v7-fc85721ff5cfb9e33ac6@gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 10:57:21PM +0800, Cen Zhang wrote:
> keyctl_read_key() checks key->type->read without holding key->sem.
> A reference keeps the key alive, but does not pin the module containing
> its type. A surviving RxRPC key can therefore be read while AF_RXRPC
> is being unloaded:
>
> KEYCTL_READ task Module unload and key GC
> ---------------- ------------------------
> lookup_user_key()
> permission / possession checks
> load key->type
> af_rxrpc_exit()
> unregister_key_type()
> GC: down_write(key->sem)
> GC: retype to key_type_dead
> GC: up_write(key->sem)
> unregister_key_type() returns
> free_module()
> read saved type's read member
>
> The final access can read freed module storage. The read invocation in
> __keyctl_read_key() is already protected by key->sem, but the earlier
> method check is outside that critical section.
>
> Move the method check into __keyctl_read_key(), after key_validate() and
> under its existing read hold on key->sem. The check and invocation then
> use the same protected type for length queries and every read retry.
> The GC cannot retype the key until the semaphore is released, and type
> unregistration waits for that GC pass before the module can be freed.
>
> Return -EOPNOTSUPP when validation succeeds and the type has no read
> method. A temporary buffer may now be allocated before this result;
> allocation and copying to userspace remain outside the semaphore.
>
> Suggested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
I literally described the fix to the reported bug instead of reviewing a
bug fix. That means by practical means that you only reported a bug.
This cannot happen again and if it does, next time I'll just do the
right fix myself and commit to the Git because that matches the reality
the best.
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Move the method check into __keyctl_read_key() under its existing read
> hold on key->sem and remove the outer check.
> - Perform key validation before checking and invoking the read method.
>
> Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/pm-key-management-objects-candidate-0010-v5-c6b7ca2813c6913e500a@gmail.com
>
> security/keys/keyctl.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/keys/keyctl.c b/security/keys/keyctl.c
> index 5a5efa26ed0e..36ffba0ebba6 100644
> --- a/security/keys/keyctl.c
> +++ b/security/keys/keyctl.c
> @@ -808,8 +808,12 @@ static long __keyctl_read_key(struct key *key, char *buffer, size_t buflen)
>
> down_read(&key->sem);
> ret = key_validate(key);
> - if (ret == 0)
> - ret = key->type->read(key, buffer, buflen);
> + if (ret == 0) {
> + if (key->type->read)
> + ret = key->type->read(key, buffer, buflen);
> + else
> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> up_read(&key->sem);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -863,11 +867,6 @@ long keyctl_read_key(key_serial_t keyid, char __user *buffer, size_t buflen)
>
> /* the key is probably readable - now try to read it */
> can_read_key:
> - if (!key->type->read) {
> - ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - goto key_put_out;
> - }
> -
> if (!buffer || !buflen) {
> /* Get the key length from the read method */
> ret = __keyctl_read_key(key, NULL, 0);
>
> base-commit: 89f5f41d296889f3b896c3ca67fcdf7d42bbdf10
> --
> 2.43.0
Br, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 14:57 Cen Zhang
2026-10-19 15:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2026-10-19 16:02 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atY0fRZ_s5UQk8Fk@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jjzuming@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®