From: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: anup@brainfault.org, atish.patra@linux.dev, pjw@kernel.org,
palmer@dabbelt.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: KVM: Convert IMSIC vsfile_lock to a raw spinlock
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 19:16:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atZPqGKEip_sW3fr@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261019134709.2610129-1-andrew.jones@linux.dev>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 03:47:09PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> kvm_riscv_vcpu_aia_imsic_put() runs from the scheduler preemption
> notifier with the raw runqueue lock held, so it must not take
> vsfile_lock, an rwlock_t, which sleeps on PREEMPT_RT. All vsfile_lock
> critical sections are short, so a raw spinlock is fine.
>
> Fixes: 4cec89db80ba ("RISC-V: KVM: Move HGEI[E|P] CSR access to IMSIC virtualization")
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@linux.dev>
> ---
> v2:
> - Convert vsfile_lock to raw_spinlock_t instead of adding a separate
> hgei_lock [Anup]
Hi Anup,
Sashiko found an ABBA deadlock with this v2[1]. Making vsfile_lock
exclusive serializes kvm_riscv_vcpu_aia_imsic_put(), which runs under
rq->__lock, against the SW-file inject paths, which kick the vCPU
(pi_lock/rq->__lock) while holding vsfile_lock. Lockdep confirms it with
an EMUL mode guest, and the host then hangs (I should have tested with
EMUL before...). v1 doesn't have the problem, since its hgei_lock never
has anything that wakes tasks nested under it. I tested v1 in both EMUL
mode and hwaccel mode [again] with lockdep and it's good.
Should we take v1 instead?
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261019134709.2610129-1-andrew.jones@linux.dev?part=1
Thanks,
drew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-19 13:47 Andrew Jones
2026-10-19 17:16 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atZPqGKEip_sW3fr@orel \
--to=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atish.patra@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®