mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: shaos <shawnq1@163.com>
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] uprobes/x86: uprobe syscall accepts forged trampoline frames
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:39:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atcao5zakyHf21yj@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020003704.1012276-1-shawnq1@163.com>

On 10/20, shaos wrote:
>
> The x86 uprobe syscall checks only that regs->ip lies somewhere in the caller's
> executable [uprobes-trampoline] VMA, then trusts ax, r11, cx and retaddr copied
> from the user stack.  A process can jump into that VMA with a fabricated frame
> and make an enabled uprobe report a hit at a site it never executed, with
> caller-chosen register values.

Yes sure. Userspace can easily fool the sanity checks in in_uprobe_trampoline().
This is a known issue. I think we don't care, and in fact IMO in_uprobe_trampoline()
can die.

At worst this can trigger a wrong a trace event, right? Nothing to fix, I think.

Oleg.

> 
> HEAD commit:    fe2ec83746e501645709761605c2464a44fd2929
> git tree:       upstream Linux checkout, local branch master
> source version: Linux 7.3.0-rc4-70-gfe2ec83746e50
> compiler:       gcc 11.4.0, GNU ld 2.38 (from the kernel build banner)
> 
> console output:
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/shaos26/82a14d478c3e5b27d81713f9989693cd/raw/9eb4cfbf7c87bf4b06cd6138775a13814ded54c6/console-output.txt
> kernel config:
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/shaos26/82a14d478c3e5b27d81713f9989693cd/raw/b1d9a09b984075b425aab4875117a6766a795110/kernel-config.txt
> reproducer:
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/shaos26/82a14d478c3e5b27d81713f9989693cd/raw/b7e400345a004b4a4c340eccad862ac1f569aaee/poc.c
> 
> Build the PoC and run it in a disposable VM with tracefs mounted.  First print the file offsets for site1 and site2, then register and enable a uprobe event at each offset.  The forge mode executes site1 once to map the trampoline, then makes the forged syscall from a uid 65534 child:
> 
>     cc -static -no-pie -O1 -fno-ipa-icf -fno-stack-protector -o forge poc.c
>     mount -t tracefs tracefs /sys/kernel/tracing
>     cp forge /forge
>     /forge offsets
>     echo "p:uprobes/site1 /forge:OFFSET1" > /sys/kernel/tracing/uprobe_events
>     echo "p:uprobes/site2 /forge:OFFSET2" >> /sys/kernel/tracing/uprobe_events
>     echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/uprobes/site1/enable
>     echo 1 > /sys/kernel/tracing/events/uprobes/site2/enable
>     echo > /sys/kernel/tracing/trace
>     /forge forge
>     cat /sys/kernel/tracing/trace
> 
> Replace OFFSET1 and OFFSET2 with the file_off1 and file_off2 values printed by /forge offsets.  Run as root for tracefs setup; the PoC drops its forged child to uid 65534.  
> 
> Two fresh boots emitted a trace event for registered site2, which was never executed, and reported attacker-chosen ax/r11/cx values.  Legitimate execution produced only site1; an unregistered offset produced no site2 event; calling uprobe without the trampoline returned EPROTO.
> 
> Impact and prerequisites:
> This falsifies tracing and profiling data for an enabled uprobe in the caller’s address space.  The evidence demonstrates event and register-value forgery, not kernel memory corruption, cross-process data disclosure, or privilege escalation.
> 
> A fix needs to authenticate the probe context before dispatching consumers.  Checking only the trampoline address is insufficient because that mapping is user-executable.
> 
> Validation: Two independent boots emitted a trace event for registered site2, which was never executed, with attacker-chosen register values.  Legitimate site1 execution, an unregistered offset, and a direct syscall without a mapped trampoline served as controls.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> shaos
.> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-20  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-20  0:37 shaos
2026-10-20  7:39 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-10-20  7:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-10-20  7:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atcao5zakyHf21yj@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shawnq1@163.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®