On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 02:16:50PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 06:48:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > TBH when I said in the commit log I was thinking of something more data
> > driven I was thinking more of having the dependencies expressed as pure
> > data, more like the way the test in set_id_regs is written.  This also
> > seems fine to me, the checks are similar.  It's just much more invasive.

> Indeed. Perhaps the config.c approach will make it easier to convert JSON
> -> code also?

I'm not sure how much of a difference it makes given that there's still
code for the actual dependency set.