From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792597469; b=sr/AFjr9BwcdmNqfNM4vzaFLeRlmgrFolJaHteyrCVVxXeqIh1+KLeOqjfCsh+fVcCAY jzSLUgFtr+hU3MtXc9fY2cjW1hXoPxvbs1IgvMya+i4yxuJO3hkM2fC+8pp/32TxmZN9V A5XHWGQMwYb/CEoeoamZBpwm6Eqds78c7pEvt/gF+Mbm2B9dAdM4R7y7jg9Jc7Ib00k5U DLtxMkwGUDhWv8Sw2FQi9ld03VntyqB2znTfwuvxe2dnsKgbMP25CkMzHbHTvjqkpOUBf uGbSEbUhNsnxeXGpL0RQy/pfynld7XxaBFgxfjZ4nXpzOWHccikMns9/zNuxVvVJIGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792597469; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To: X-Cookie; bh=4kcXDJhEfENFHuyA+lYroTo7cmLFPG8UX1ID8jIbjAE=; b=DZV+r++Gr3GyZTXlMphzsmOOfs5PRiTCV6Da7i7ZS2k4JaXGagE/KLqv7dQ7Tkc4zgBY JvT27SgziQHKYcOLG9Yp3ptjEcPjG3ocEMN/rL/EqnfYhoxFMKbSXKwMeOjIY9xA2S7zR grua6Ye5lyld59/gPxemsIrTm/XcfQLGZipP0jClPzKp4dvDTbNUV+Ctcj8PapdgiPGKp IJPOCJx7xBs3NfEYMDXB52ebnDkLEgNAjkOGeCvH/pHm7qD1C+UMDJXy2B76+K4EB7jgn PbndO/IE5bPmIOQMA0drpLSRYvtOpshq4JVFb/8s4gv2tq5pGJuCOFvPac4rTaPXqwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=Mo7xzRhE; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 548DE606A334; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 15:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=Mo7xzRhE Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B49D11F000C1; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 15:44:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792597468; bh=4kcXDJhEfENFHuyA+lYroTo7cmLFPG8UX1ID8jIbjAE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Mo7xzRhEgPIbjPjOPjzFXzBcvgAiCuOyW6f2SHflaCGJu6mCMwAKU1OlP3dYvjw5y HH69cHHF8gH1/Te1jqAcddWOpBFIhC0TNcN8ByBSDaZ1M76BZqur9sVejIM15JW5H5 EsAgq/Gp7juChmcyxYcJPj4YICO1or8l2c7j5d4k/o3TlBMBrBJcRSMgfxAgKGiAAl gvBmzj6q6cMHVMAEJNfU/g2r8/SCu3ZxrjWzcxk/nY1J2J206ZSwf76cQgw90/1ujH mFlax4+tAZ4/o79FkDQmci6XRBJpivOn3e0ooAbvvP/STS/ReSLqmG+EOujh4qrtfk mYIpGhIScBaSQ== Received: by traversing.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B7F9C1CEA6B9; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 16:44:26 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 16:44:26 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" Cc: Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Joey Gouly , Suzuki K Poulose , Shuah Khan , Oliver Upton , Fuad Tabba , Peter Maydell , Leonardo Bras , Wei-Lin Chang , Yao Yuan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 02/15] KVM: arm64: Refuse to start a guest with S1PIE or S1POE but not TCR2 Message-ID: References: <20260930-arm64-gcs-v21-0-3556644cd927@kernel.org> <20260930-arm64-gcs-v21-2-3556644cd927@kernel.org> <86fqyn2che.wl-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XlGPDImXBOHBZN3B" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Whoever dies with the most toys wins. --XlGPDImXBOHBZN3B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 02:16:50PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 06:48:37PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > TBH when I said in the commit log I was thinking of something more data > > driven I was thinking more of having the dependencies expressed as pure > > data, more like the way the test in set_id_regs is written. This also > > seems fine to me, the checks are similar. It's just much more invasive. > Indeed. Perhaps the config.c approach will make it easier to convert JSON > -> code also? I'm not sure how much of a difference it makes given that there's still code for the actual dependency set. --XlGPDImXBOHBZN3B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQReagvpf3TrrA7BoYYv73Ows9A4iQUCatjd2gAKCRAv73Ows9A4 iZlOAP4sLpPvccqJReB8Mwy526cPBNWAF6ETiDO4ErTN2k8z1AEAsIpkS9DcFELc uBP7TL5YvgkbZg81LWuZNJGnIL2vMQU= =g8kZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XlGPDImXBOHBZN3B--