From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Avi Weiss <thnkslprpt@gmail.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: fall back when no preferred housekeeping CPU is online
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 15:02:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atoJWzlJwtxY5I3h@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020125518.1114230-1-thnkslprpt@gmail.com>
Le Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 03:55:18PM +0300, Avi Weiss a écrit :
> kthread_fetch_affinity() falls back to the housekeeping mask
> only when the intersection with the preferred mask is empty.
>
> If the intersection contains only offline CPUs,
> set_cpus_allowed_ptr() returns -EINVAL and the kthread keeps
> its previous affinity, which may still include an isolated CPU.
>
> Check whether the intersection contains an online CPU instead.
> Fall back to the full housekeeping mask when none are online.
>
> Fixes: e894f6339808 ("kthread: Honour kthreads preferred affinity after cpuset changes")
> Signed-off-by: Avi Weiss <thnkslprpt@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Tested on x86_64 Linux 7.3.0 with vng/qemu and a kthread with
> preferred CPUs 1-2.
>
> With CPU 2 offline and CPU 1 isolated, the unpatched kernel kept
> affinity 1-2 and set_cpus_allowed_ptr() returned -EINVAL. With the
> fix, affinity changed to 0,2. Bringing CPU 2 online restored
> affinity to 2, and removing isolation restored 1-2.
>
> kernel/kthread.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> index cc8cb5d3eab7..fdb8fb07f40b 100644
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static void kthread_fetch_affinity(struct kthread *kthread, struct cpumask *cpum
> }
>
> cpumask_and(cpumask, pref, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN));
> - if (cpumask_empty(cpumask))
> + if (!cpumask_intersects(cpumask, cpu_online_mask))
> cpumask_copy(cpumask, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN));
> }
Good catch thank you! Queueing it.
>
>
> base-commit: f47d223627f80cb7a1eb14c585fe6cb35de5e984
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 12:55 Avi Weiss
2026-10-20 15:08 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-10-22 13:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atoJWzlJwtxY5I3h@localhost.localdomain \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=thnkslprpt@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®