From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"open list:LIBRARY CODE" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KEYS: From assoc_array to rhashtable migration
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 15:36:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <attU1XQg7BIvhPag@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023120953.1206778-1-jarkko@kernel.org>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 03:09:20PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> The keyring subsystem depends on assoc_array for searching keys by their
> description, type and domain. It is the sole user of this data structure,
> which has during the age of LLMs transformed into a maintenance nightmare.
>
> assoc_array needs to be replaced with a data structure meeting the
> following criteria:
>
> 1. Must be suitable for a sparse key-value store.
> 2. Must have multiple in-kernel users.
> 3. Would be nice if it had dedicated maintainers.
>
> rhashtable is likely the best pick from the available options as it is
> designed for a sparse key space, has dedicated maintainers, and multiple
> in-kernel users.
>
> CHANGES
> =======
>
> v2:
> - Tried to address all the issues pointed out by David and Eric. Tell me
> if something was ignored, as that would be an unintentional mishap.
> - Updated and trimmed the source code comments.
> - For assoc_array_edit I decided to go with two-element pointer array,
> which shifts a bit what David suggested.
> - Dropped is_keyring flag. It was so obvious call so I mention it here
> just in case because too obvious maxes out my self-doubt ;-)
> - Used cleanup.h primitives where I possibly could especially in order
> to make fallible initializations more bug-resistant.
> - The already-ack'd bug fixes are included but will be dropped as soon
> as I've sent them over to Linus.
>
> VERSIONS
> ========
>
> - v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/20261016215326.4110064-1-jarkko@kernel.org/`
>
> Jarkko Sakkinen (6):
> KEYS: Expand key->{datalen,quotalen} to unsigned int
> KEYS: Reject descriptions larger than KEY_MAX_DESC_SIZE
> KEYS: Verify the key identity in __key_unlink_begin
> KEYS: Introduce keyring_is_empty()
> KEYS: Replace assoc_array with rhashtable
> lib: Remove assoc_array
>
> Documentation/core-api/assoc_array.rst | 564 ------
> Documentation/core-api/index.rst | 1 -
> .../zh_CN/core-api/assoc_array.rst | 473 -----
> .../translations/zh_CN/core-api/index.rst | 1 -
> drivers/md/dm-verity-verify-sig.c | 2 +-
> fs/smb/client/cifsacl.c | 6 +-
> fs/verity/signature.c | 2 +-
> include/keys/keyring-type.h | 1 -
> include/linux/assoc_array.h | 88 -
> include/linux/assoc_array_priv.h | 178 --
> include/linux/key.h | 27 +-
> lib/Kconfig | 14 -
> lib/Makefile | 1 -
> lib/assoc_array.c | 1724 -----------------
> security/keys/Kconfig | 1 -
> security/keys/internal.h | 9 +-
> security/keys/key.c | 30 +-
> security/keys/keyctl.c | 2 -
> security/keys/keyring.c | 871 ++++-----
> security/keys/request_key.c | 24 +-
> .../dm-verity/test-dm-verity-keyring.sh | 2 +-
> 21 files changed, 457 insertions(+), 3564 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/core-api/assoc_array.rst
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/translations/zh_CN/core-api/assoc_array.rst
> delete mode 100644 include/linux/assoc_array.h
> delete mode 100644 include/linux/assoc_array_priv.h
> delete mode 100644 lib/assoc_array.c
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
I must have typoed my send-email command-line as Eric was supposed to be
Cc'do to the whole thread, duh. Will be addressed next round, apologies.
Br, Jarkko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 12:09 Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-23 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KEYS: Expand key->{datalen,quotalen} to unsigned int Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-23 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KEYS: Reject descriptions larger than KEY_MAX_DESC_SIZE Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-23 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KEYS: Verify the key identity in __key_unlink_begin Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-23 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KEYS: Introduce keyring_is_empty() Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-23 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KEYS: Replace assoc_array with rhashtable Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-23 13:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-23 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] lib: Remove assoc_array Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-23 12:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=attU1XQg7BIvhPag@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®