mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Antoine HURET <antoine.huret@bull.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] perf: Rewrite core context handling breaks multiplexed cgroup events
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:28:59 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atvRmz_uGKpiYfMv@phoenix2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015132135.GK4121339@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 03:21:35PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 12:30:55PM +0000, Antoine HURET wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 11:13 UTC, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > /me mutters something about having to go install and learn docker and
> > > what's wrong with simple shells scripts that poke about in /cgroup
> > > filesystems :-)

> > Fair enough, sorry about that! Next time I'll do plain cgroupfs,
> > promised :-)
 
> FWIW, it might be useful to extend perf-test with a bunch of cgroup
> tests - this one included. AFAICT we have nothing there atm.

The more the merrier, so far:

acme@phoenix2:~/git/perf-tools-next$ grep -rw cgroup tools/perf/tests/
tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c:#include "cgroup.h"
tools/perf/tests/expand-cgroup.c:			pr_debug("cgroup name doesn't match:\n");
tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/perf_json_output_lint.py:      'cgroup': lambda x: True,
tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh:	echo "Testing perf lock contention --lock-cgroup"
tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh:	perf lock con -a -b --lock-cgroup -E 1 -q -- ${msg_workload} > /dev/null 2> ${result}
tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh:	echo "Testing perf lock contention --cgroup-filter"
tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh:	perf lock con -a -b --lock-cgroup -E 1 -F wait_total -q \
tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh:		echo "[Fail] BPF result should have a cgroup result:" "$(cat "${result}")"
tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh:	cgroup=$(cat "${result}" | awk '{ print $3 }')
tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh:	perf lock con -a -b --lock-cgroup -E 1 -G "${cgroup}" -q \
tools/perf/tests/shell/lock_contention.sh:		echo "[Fail] BPF result should have a result with cgroup filter:" "$(cat "${cgroup}")"
tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh:  if ! perf record -e task-clock --filter 'cgroup == /' \
tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh:       -a --all-cgroups --synth=cgroup -o "${perfdata}" true 2> /dev/null
tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh:    echo "Cgroup bpf-filter test [Skipped cgroup not supported]"
tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh:  # 'cgroup' requires PERF_SAMPLE_CGROUP flag
tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh:  if ! perf record -e task-clock --filter 'cgroup == /' \
tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh:  if ! perf report -i "${perfdata}" -s cgroup -q | grep -q -F '100.00%'
tools/perf/tests/shell/record_bpf_filter.sh:    echo "Cgroup bpf-filter test [Failed root cgroup does not have 100%]"
tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh:  perf script -i "${perfdata}" -F cgroup 2>/dev/null | grep -q -v "unknown"
tools/perf/tests/shell/record.sh:    -aB --synth=cgroup --all-cgroups || ret=$?
tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_summary.sh:# summary only for system wide - cgroup summary mode with BPF
tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_summary.sh:test_perf_trace "-as --summary-mode=cgroup --bpf-summary"
tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_summary.sh:# summary with normal output for system wide - cgroup summary mode with BPF
tools/perf/tests/shell/trace_summary.sh:test_perf_trace "-aS --summary-mode=cgroup --bpf-summary"
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:# perf stat --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup test (no_mlock)
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:# skip if --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup is not supported
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:	if ! perf stat -a --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup / true > /dev/null 2>&1; then
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:			echo "Skipping: --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup not supported"
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:			perf --no-pager stat -a --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup / true || true
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:	if [ -d /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice ] && [ -d /sys/fs/cgroup/user.slice ]; then
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:	find_cgroups_self_cgrp=$(grep perf_event /proc/self/cgroup | cut -d: -f3)
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:		# cgroup v2 doesn't specify perf_event
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:		find_cgroups_self_cgrp=$(grep ^0: /proc/self/cgroup | cut -d: -f3)
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:# As cgroup events are cpu-wide, we cannot simply compare the result.
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:	check_system_wide_counted_output=$(perf stat -a --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup ${test_cgroups} -e cpu-clock -x, sleep 1  2>&1)
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_bpf_counters_cgrp.sh:	expand_output=$(perf stat -a -x, --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup / true 2>&1 | wc -l)
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:# perf stat metrics --for-each-cgroup test (no_mlock)
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:	if [ -d /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice ] && [ -d /sys/fs/cgroup/user.slice ]
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:	find_cgroups_self_cgrp=$(grep perf_event /proc/self/cgroup | cut -d: -f3)
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:		# cgroup v2 doesn't specify perf_event
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:		find_cgroups_self_cgrp=$(grep ^0: /proc/self/cgroup | cut -d: -f3)
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:# Check if metric is reported for each cgroup
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:			--for-each-cgroup "${test_cgroups}" \
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:		# Find metric lines for this cgroup
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:			/)  # The root cgroup, leave unchanged.
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:		# We use exact cgroup match with surrounding commas
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:			echo "FAIL: No metric lines found for cgroup '${cgrp}'"
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:				log_verbose "Enforcing metric check for cgroup '${cgrp}' \
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:for cgroup '${cgrp}'"
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:					echo "FAIL: Empty metric value for cgroup '${cgrp}'"
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:				log_verbose "Skipping metric check for cgroup '${cgrp}' \
tools/perf/tests/shell/stat_metrics_cgrp.sh:if perf stat -a --bpf-counters --for-each-cgroup / true > /dev/null 2>&1
tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c:		COMP(cgroup);
tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c:		.cgroup		= 114,
tools/perf/tests/Build:perf-test-y += expand-cgroup.o
acme@phoenix2:~/git/perf-tools-next$

- Arnaldo

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-23 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-15  9:03 Antoine HURET
2026-10-15 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-15 12:30   ` Antoine HURET
2026-10-15 13:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-10-23 21:28       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atvRmz_uGKpiYfMv@phoenix2 \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=antoine.huret@bull.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®